dmlt12's channel

@wjfox2006 agree with wj, why risk an overwhelming impact when the measures to minimise or prevent it will not have such a catastrophic risk attached!!! Especially if it is done in a reasonable manner eg increase renewables; suggest put a per capita target/goal on tons of carbon per person per y...

as previous comments have said you can google "global temperature 2000 to 2011" but as apposed to supporting the "deniers" position it generally supports the significant influence man is having on the environment

the figure 2035 was wrong ; should not have been used but the general melting trend is not also the video indicates a 1 degree. recent. rise in atmospheric temps in the area .

Cherry Picking BS to support the PR Denial Campaign.

Science is by far more on the side of MMGW

I would rather an engineer to help interpret scientific data than a Journalist or person with a English - Arts Degree; or a good talker.

Crazy to expect to in essence expect forensic in relation to 4 polar bear deaths (may be normal storm, may be bigger storm due to global warming, stats to small anyway to be "sure" of the reasons why): BUT THE ISSUE OF INCREASED RISK OF MORE DEATHS IF ARCTIC ICE RETREATS (AS IT IS) IS UNDENIABLE..

Cant bear to watch all of this BS..just his first point about IPCC 6cm vs 6M..totally agree with Abrahams view...Monckton only proves to me (demonstrates to me here) how he either tries to mislead people or is otherwise is unable to understand or comprehend the science as Abraham puts it.

Good speaker; many turkey comments in relation to scientific content. Lets get on with action eg increase renewables - even when tobacco and oil funding aids some of the denial approach - which wants to delay or prevent such action.

Too shallow; outdated; doesn't reveal true facts of mmgw. The plan is not to ban CO2 - yes its needed by plants - idiot position - we just have too much CO2. IS IT THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND? Or the agenda here is to mislead & warp the facts?

sorry Nightversionn

Seems like a fantasy conspiracy theory to distract people from the Severe foreseeable risks of the reality of man made climate change

Hilarious thanks but a really good point about those who ignorantly dismiss mmgw because local weather is cold ..includes the hilarious but ignoramus behaviour on Fox TV

some here comparing sun & CO2 500million years ago if high CO2 low temps but sun less intense..ratios given between suns effect & CO2 were given as same ..(20x)..I suggest that CO2 does effect temp & can do significantly but perhaps changes from the sun have a higher multiplier & more immediate e...

whilst the quantifiable amount of energy that is absorbed and re-transmited to earth via each CO2 molecules

Who to get more reliable information from ..can be various but usually include consulting with those most qualified Doctors - your health for climate - Climatologists; of which the vast majority agree that 1 earth temperatures are increasing on average globally 2 that in the last few decades CO2 ...

ice maps here confirmed elsewhere - obvious fact that Arctic is drastically reducing in size - yeah you probably want to deny that too - seems to me that many "denies" are likely to remain so even if the worst predicted scenarios are upon us!

"The El Nino Southern Oscillation,cannot explain an overall buildup of global ocean heat..This points to an energy imbalance responsible for long term trend"...see the Andriod Wjdget " Skeptical Science. CSIRO WWF MET Bureaus & many other professional scientific groups see the huge for-seeable ri...

Great video presentation; thanks!!

Whilst a lot of qualified scientists, especially most climatologists put forward legitimate scientific papers that indicate mmgw (perhaps there are some from the "other side"?)..there seem to be many who want to use belittling language (of cause of a proven scientific standard) to try to cast dou...

con'd....have heard volcanoes discussed & discounted..especially those on land where their recent average annual CO2 output equates to less than a week of mans recent average CO2 output)

Agree in most part with aerobique, however action is needed now just as much or more than debates about it. It has been claimed (including in utube) that some of these debates are prompted from some of the "deniers" not so much from a real scientific perspective but from their need to confound an...

Action is needed to reduce mans production of greenhouse gas emissions...eg develop technologies & systems that produce less of these gases ..maybe increase employment in these areas..ie some positives (as well as reducing the significant risks)...Arguments from those fighting the risks of mmgw I...

@howardsway782 Yes I agree; what I've read in a number of science articles is that for the last few decades sun spot and sun activity that gives us more heat on Earth has decreased a little whilst CO2 and World average temps (note world and average ..also includes average ocean temps) temps also ...

Great Video; act now on increasing renewable use!

checkout android widget "skeptical science"; research the science where you may find more facts & maybe some good public speakers as well

Fact: the last decade sun influence declining CO2 & temps increasing

to assume most scientists & other human beings believing in action on mmgw are acting as tools of some puppet masters seems crazy ..the scientists were using their knowledge & training in chemistry. physics maths & climatology (& perhaps humanity ); to earn a dollar may be as well (like most of u...