Playlists
|
Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial captures the turmoil that tore apart the community of Dover, Pennsylvania in a landmark battle over the teaching of evolution in public schools. In 2004, the Dover school board ordered science teachers to read a statement to high school biology students about an alternative to Darwin s theory of evolution called intelligent design the idea that life is too complex to have evolved naturally and so must have been designed by an intelligent agent. The teachers refused to comply, and both parents and teachers filed a lawsuit in federal court accusing the school board of violating the constitutional separation of church and state. This is the trial where Behe admitted that if the definition of science was broadened to allow ID, it would also sweep in Astrology. This is the trial which saw Kenneth Miller completely dismantle "Irreducible Complexity". This is the trial where Buckingham and Bonsell went from saying "we don't know where the books came from" to the revelation that Buckingham had taken up an offering in his church, banked the money, wrote a cheque to Bonsell, Bonsell gave it to his father and his father bought the ID books. This is the trial where a number of key witnesses from the upper echelon of the Discovery Institute pulled out at the last minute and therefore would not defend the claims of intelligent Design under oath. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/i
|
|
A Question Of Origins - Debunk
6
Videos
***THIS SERIES WAS SUSPENDED DUE TO A FALSE DMCA CLAIM BY ETERNAL PRODUCTIONS. DMCA COUNTER NOTIFICATIONS WERE FILED AND WERE UNCHALLENGED*****
This debunk of young earth creationist lies and misrepresentations includes many promoted by ICR "Institute Of Creation Research" (where you go to learn to become a quoteminologist). Gary Parker, Dwayne Gish, John Morris and many other will amuse you with their wacky, zany ideas. Unfortunately, they will also terrify you when you realise that they want these lies taught in school science classes and many people actually believe whatever these liars put out. youtube.com/extantdodo |
|
Expelled Debunk - Flunked
16
Videos
Expelled makes some outrageous claims. But what really happened to the people they claim were persecuted for their views? And what is the real story about evolution and Intelligent Design?
In practically every scene, Expelled insults the science of evolution and the scientists who study it, accepting the long-ago-debunked criticisms and conspiracy theories of the intelligent design proponents as valid. On the contrary, evolution is well accepted in the scientific community, where it is considered the organizing principle of biology and central as well to the field of geology. The notion that scientists have formed an atheistic cabal to keep intelligent design from its day in the sun is ludicrous. Intelligent design has not produced any research to suppress. When prominent ID proponent Michael Behe was asked about his research, and why "you don't do those tests?" he responded, "I myself would prefer to spend time in what I would consider to be more fruitful endeavors." If even proponents of ID do not think it is a fruitful enterprise, why should the scientific community take any interest in it? Intelligent design is scientifically unproductive, and this perhaps explains why scientists like Guillermo Gonzalez and Michael Behe publish far fewer papers after they become attracted to intelligent design. Ultimately, intelligent design's lack of success in science departments is the fault of the flawed and unscientific nature of intelligent design itself, not the result of bias in the scientific community. The issue is not the suppression of ID, but the lack of warrant for its scientific claims. And ultimately, ID has an uphill struggle to demonstrate that it is, indeed, science. The fundamental problem with intelligent design as science is that intelligent design claims cannot be tested. Scientific testing requires that there be some set of phenomena which are incompatible with your idea. No observation could possibly be incompatible with a claim that an "intelligent agent" (whom everyone recognizes as God) acted to, say, introduce information into a system. Untestable claims are not scientific claims. Regardless of their attractiveness as religious ideas (although many people of faith strongly reject intelligent design) intelligent design has not passed muster as science. Flunked - Expelled Debunked by PrometheusWithLight http://www.youtube.com/Prometh http://www.expelledexposed.com |
Videos
(508)
[TRANSLATED]
Discovery Institute - Casey Lusk...
This DonExodus2 video (Casey Luskin: Liar, Hypocrite, Imbecilic Assclown.) was dis...
[TRANSLATED]
Tetrapod Evolution 1of5
[TRANSLATED]
Tetrapod Evolution 1of5
Tetrapods are vertebrate animals having four feet, legs or leglike appendages. Amp...
[TRANSLATED]
Dinosaur to bird evolution 1of5
[TRANSLATED]
Dinosaur to bird evolution 1of5
Today's scientists are recreating dinosaurs through genetic engineering. Sounds li...
[TRANSLATED]
Feather Evolution 1of5
[TRANSLATED]
Feather Evolution 1of5
Whilst the traditional view on the evolution of feathers was in relation to flight...
[TRANSLATED]
PZ Myers destroys Simmonds in ev...
[TRANSLATED]
PZ Myers destroys Simmonds in evolution debate 1of5
PZ Myers completely eviscerates his opposition Geoffrey Simmonds in this classic d...
[TRANSLATED]
Ape To Man 1of10
[TRANSLATED]
Ape To Man 1of10
Beginning with the discovery of ancient fossils found in Germany at a time when Ch...
[TRANSLATED]
Creationist DMCA abuse
[TRANSLATED]
Creationist DMCA abuse
This video is a result of a collaboration between the following YouTube users;
...
[TRANSLATED]
Discovery Institute Parody 1of5
[TRANSLATED]
Discovery Institute Parody 1of5
The satire DiscoverInstituteID has been falsely DMCA'd by the Discovery Institute....
Votebotted - Please assist
Evolution Debate - djarm67 vs Dr Steve Kumar 1of2
June 16, 2009, 06:08 PM
YouTuber and League of Reason member djarm67, debates creationist Dr Steve Kumar in a live radio debate. No idea why I wrote that bit in the third person. Make sure that you watch both parts. You don't want to miss the end. In a live debate, you don't have the opportunity to t...
Permalink
Evolution Debate - djarm67 vs Dr Steve Kumar 2of2
June 16, 2009, 06:07 PM
YouTuber and League of Reason member djarm67, debates creationist Dr Steve Kumar in a live radio debate. Make sure that you watch both parts. You don't want to miss the end. In a live debate, you don't have the opportunity to take a timeout to research any points made by the o...
Permalink
Favorites
(246)
[TRANSLATED]
6% Of Scientist Are Republicans
[TRANSLATED]
6% Of Scientist Are Republicans
Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com
[TRANSLATED]
One Atheist's Inspiration
[TRANSLATED]
One Atheist's Inspiration
http://www.helpjacqui.com/
[TRANSLATED]
Ida met the challenge again
[TRANSLATED]
Ida met the challenge again
Part three of my rebuttal of the new VenomFangX, (GEERUP & sablechicken) and their...
[TRANSLATED]
Ida met the challenge too
[TRANSLATED]
Ida met the challenge too
Part two of my rebuttal of the new VenomFangX, (GEERUP & sablechicken) and their w...
[TRANSLATED]
Ida met the challenge
[TRANSLATED]
Ida met the challenge
My response to the new VenomFangX, GEERUP, and his associate in disguise, SableChi...
[TRANSLATED]
Arizona State Senator Sylvia All...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzJhTfQiMA
[TRANSLATED]
Welcome to the Universe - III: T...
Part III: The Size of Things
In this episode, we take a breif trip through the ...
[TRANSLATED]
luskin vs q-dragon
[TRANSLATED]
luskin vs q-dragon
a little phone call...
Ray says yes, hes up for an on camera discussion.
Gate 1, consent, passed.
Hur...
Channel Comments
(644)
|
djarm67
(6 hours ago)
|
|
|
ashman165
(8 hours ago)
Thank you for the acceptance.
- Ash |
|
|
ashman165
(19 hours ago)
So, I was listening to the, ahem, debate you guys had going there without paying any attention to your video. Out of the corner of my eye, I happened to notice the dark knight from _Monty Python_ and it took half a second to click why you had it up. Anyway, kudos there. One thing I noticed, however, was this "Dr." kept saying "as a matter of fact" which was immediately followed by nothing which even purported to be a fact. "As a matter of fact" and then just nothing. I love that his, well at least what I think is anyway, strongest argument is that modern evolutionary theory must be wrong because Darwin proposed it 150 years ago and we've replaced some of his theory in light of new evidence. Excellent. If that's his idea of scholarship, then he simply needs to do much better.
|
|
|
djarm67
(1 day ago)
My views on mind-body dualism would not really fit in the comment sections. Plato? Aquinas? Spinoza? There are many points of similarity and difference. Mind-body dualism is also a constraint within itself.
|
|
|
MatthewPalumbo
(3 days ago)
What are your views on Mind-Body Dualism?
|
|
|
djarm67
(1 week ago)
No imagination required. A scan through my channel or video comments and it will be blatantly obvious that I don't censor comments
I accept all friend requests DJ |
|
|
theanswersofnwo3
(1 week ago)
Okay I think you are imagining the fact that you did not deleted my comment. Thank you for accepting the request. If you are interested you can look into TubeBlasterPro v.1.2.9
|
|
|
djarm67
(1 week ago)
Rubbish. It's 2 pages back you goose.
|
|
|
theanswersofnwo3
(1 week ago)
You are a liar. You deleted my comment where I showed you Jesus spoke about creation.
|
|
|
djarm67
(1 week ago)
theanswersofnwo3 wrote: "Typical atheist. You are not a Christian. You deleat my comment that makes your religion of evolution look stupid."
Wrong, Wrong and wrong, I have deleted no comments of yours. |

Add to iGoogle
























Censorship is not a valid form of argument.
DJ