Subscription preferences


Loading icon Loading...



High Court Challenge to School Chaplains Please Assist

1,923 views 3 months ago
The 2nd High Court Challenge to the validity of the funding model for the National Schools Chaplaincy Program is about to be heard.

Father of 6, Ronnie Williams, had the courage to challenge this transparent funding dispersal to religious groups in the High Court of Australia and won. The Federal Government then hastily passed legislation to continue the funding. This is now the subject of the 2nd High Court Challenge.

Please assist Ronnie Williams by donating to help meet the legal costs of this important and historic challenge. All amounts big or small will be extremely appreciated. If you can even spare $10 or $20, please do so. You will be contributing to an initiative of extreme importance.

Details on how to donate are provided at the link below.


Please share, like, comment and mirror this video.

Here is a message from Ronnie

"I am returning to the High Court of Australia on the 6th,7th and 8th of May 2014. A substantial amount to meet my legal costs and disbursements is yet to be raised. Any assistance between now and the handing-down of the Court's decision will be deeply appreciated. This movie is a whistle-stop tour of possibly the most outrageous political stunt ever foisted upon the taxpayers of Australia." Show less
Read more

Human Ape Play

Humans are apes. Great apes. Apes all belong to the superfamily Hominoidea. The great apes are the family Hominidae which we share with the Chimpanzees, Gorillas and the Orangutan. Our DNA is less than 2 percent different from that of chimpanzees, so from a biological viewpoint, what is it that makes humans so different from the other great apes? Find out what our ape cousins can do -- and what they can't.

Every home should have the National Geographic Channel. Please support this organisation by subscribing to their cable and YouTube channels, buying their magazine and clicking on ads that may appear during this series here.


Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial Play

Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial captures the turmoil that tore apart the community of Dover, Pennsylvania in a landmark battle over the teaching of evolution in public schools. In 2004, the Dover school board ordered science teachers to read a statement to high school biology students about an alternative to Darwin s theory of evolution called intelligent design the idea that life is too complex to have evolved naturally and so must have been designed by an intelligent agent. The teachers refused to comply, and both parents and teachers filed a lawsuit in federal court accusing the school board of violating the constitutional separation of church and state. This is the trial where Behe admitted that if the definition of science was broadened to allow ID, it would also sweep in Astrology. This is the trial which saw Kenneth Miller completely dismantle "Irreducible Complexity". This is the trial where Buckingham and Bonsell went from saying "we don't know where the books came from" to the revelation that Buckingham had taken up an offering in his church, banked the money, wrote a cheque to Bonsell, Bonsell gave it to his father and his father bought the ID books. This is the trial where a number of key witnesses from the upper echelon of the Discovery Institute pulled out at the last minute and therefore would not defend the claims of intelligent Design under oath. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/

Eye Evolution Play

One of the most common and dishonest quote mines by creationist cult organisations is in relation to Charles Darwin and the evolution of the eye. Darwin is quoted as saying,

"To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree."

Creationist cult leaders and their indoctrinated followers point to this as an admission from Darwin that the eye could not have evolved. There could be nothing further from the truth.

The immediately following paragraph from Darwin is suspiciously excluded.

"Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself first originated; but I may remark that several facts make me suspect that any sensitive nerve may be rendered sensitive to light, and likewise to those coarser vibrations of the air which produce sound."

Darwin then spends a number of pages describing a sequence of intermediate stages which we already have examples of in nature.

This series is courtesy of the history Channel. Please subscribe to their YouTube channel and cable channel if available in your area.


Popular uploads Play

to add this to Watch Later

Add to