NOW got ya'!  Great point you make! Thanks ^

And last, when applying common sense about such a thing as the WTC attacks and results thereoff, it is quite simply the worse thing that we can do to our endeavour to reach the truth. And this is why, common sense is a good thing when your dealing with practical ordinary things like, dont cross the road whey the light is red, or dont eat the yellow snow.
But in very small and very big things it is close to utterly useless.
Quantum theory has prooved that conclusively in the case of the subatomic world
When dealing with big dynamic systems, like weather, solar dynamics or large buildings collapsing, there are just to many things that we dont know, and it is a problem that things are asumed to be ! instead of applying inquiry, math science in an unpartial way, instead of only looking for whatever scrap of evidence that can be interpreted as a confirmation of whoevers pet theory.
does this all answer your question ?

Third, in regards to why I prefer the goverments version,,, I dont !
There are unanswered questions, they have an interest in shutting down discussion about these questions. But that does not mean that they are nessesarly lying about anything !
Its like the famous JFK conspiracy, Yes we know that there was a conspcy, but the onlly thing we know about it for sure is that the Warran commision conspiered to close the book on the case as quickly as possible, not why. The reason could have been utterly benign, or sinister, thing is we cant tell from the evidence left to us. And when we try to, we are engaged in idle speculation, not serious investigation.

My problem about the truthers, is not that I dont want it to be true !
My first problem is that their standard of evidence are the same as religious people, examble, in their world this is how it goes, if I cant prove them factually wrong, then they asume that they must be right, that is a fallacy !
Second, If they are proven wrong in 1 thing, they dont chek their facts in the light of new evidence or even the new evidence, instead they asume that the new evidence is doctored, and therefore is further proof of their position, that makes eveything they say and think like a religious doctrine, unchanging and unfalsifiable !

Hey mate. Sorry I didn't get back to you for a long time. I've been on holidays and haven't gone on YouTube too much. Firstly could you please tell me the scientific evidence you are looking for? What equations are you looking for? My question is, why do you chose to believe the government when they have less proof than the architects, engineers and pilots that say there is something wrong with the entire 9-11 commission report?