Thanks Thieue!

I just completed watching the entire film.

Great work!

Denierbud,
If i'm following you - mattress issues are a holocaust industry bash, and don't even need to be relevant to what you may consider alledged claims of genocide

- claims of hair products have(?) failed to deliver actual products, but yet the piles of packaged hair, and documents remain
- i don't think you are having a successful "Finkelstein"
- everybody else seems to be inflating unrelated dogma, or trying to repaint NS with whatever they have, wherever, and whenever they can find it

- trying to mix unrelated(?) issues, would explain my confusion with inclusions/ ommissions/ cessations
HB

--continued--

And you asked "does it really matter?" Yes, because my thesis is this is anti-German war propaganda.

1991: New York Times tells everyone that Saddam's forces are pulling babies off life support systems at a hospital.

Does it really matter? Yes, it was pro-war propaganda, designed to make the American public pro-war.

It's the same concept.

Hi Housebrand,

Whatever about your "get freaky" theory.

Some people can see how ridiculous the concept of "human hair mattresses" is on face value. It's as ridiculous as such a thing nowadays.

Denierbud,
i think where i'm at here is that the both of you are significantly clenched to your conclusions to such a point that there is not much to compare.
e.g.- hair mattresses: what does their presence or absence -really- prove?
HC might not have mentioned it, as they seem more reactionary, maybe concerned that Rajzman did lie, or maybe worried that the absence of mattresses will confuse some.
However, you are so attached to Rajzman being a liar that you might not seek hair related documents, let alone translate them.
I don't think either of you have the freedom to explore the mattress story as a quip from a twisted guard who might have suggested german women "getting freaky" on mattresses made from camp hair - questions regarding poor taste in humor by camp guards would not even exist if not for your combined competive energies.
-what slippery slope bodes for no mattresses, and Rajzman not being a liar anyway?
HB

Hi Czar,

Not to mention that Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec are almost all eyewitness-based. How is that going to lend itself to a museum exhibit?

I'm pretty sure this museum doesn't have a model of these camps.

So regarding these three camps, what exactly am I going to see at the museum you recommend? Video footage of Bomba? I've already seen it on their website, and incorporated it into a chapter in my movie.

Hi Czar,

Your anecdote for me: visit the holocaust museum and talk to some survivors.

My movie has a number of references to the US Holocaust memorial museum website (see "Belzec Chronicles.", see "Nuremberg") and my movie is full of survivor testimony.

Your advice is feel-good meaningless.

Evem a the trials in Tehran didnt prove anything, it was just Ahmenidinajad trust trying to get attention from the west. So i guess i do see parallels in both of your works.

Evem a the trials in Tehran didnt prove anything, it was just Ahmenidinajad trust trying to get attention from the west. So i guess i do see parallels in both of your works.