damo2353's channel

Not that he is an angel, but the plaintiff is so obviously full of shit.

@badmovebaker "Civilised condescension". You nailed it perfectly!

"Mike Rinder still believes in Scientology and its founder L Ron Hubbard". So he's an idiot then.

@cmwen Also, note that she was not countersuing for child support, so he clearly wasn't too remiss in his obligations

Who do we think wins the point started at 1:10:00? I think that Krauss is right here. Its what politicians do that is of interest, not what they claim to believe.

Illegal, but good play by the prop!

@alfamonk If you note JJ's reasoning she wasn't taking the kids word as evidence at all. What she found was that the kid said that he was hit by the plaintiff, JJ specifically says that she doesn't know if it actually happened or not (probably she thinks it didn't) but that the defendant had a g...

This call feels like a setup.

@michael0156 What contraindications? You proceeded to argue that something else was required to cause cancer. Fine, that is exactly what "necessary but not sufficient" means. In order to get CC you need HPV and something else (according to you anyway). So following your claims the most logic...

I'm not sure if this video is posted seriously or ironically but I can say that this argument will only reassure those who are already convinced that gay marriage is wrong. It will not convince anyone who believes otherwise or who is on the fence.

@lillkutty007 It is there now under "Yes Prime Minister Christmas special". It is a special double length episode.

They should have shown the next scene which is Humpy reading the story in the paper with a look of total anguish on his face.

This might sound silly but I think I believe the defendant. I am extremely suspicious about the plaintiffs story, it just didn't ring true.

If he had defended himself better I think he might have been able to show that there was no credible evidence that she ever gave him any money.

@BlimeyGames Amazingly its about 1 in a hundred, and since the vast majority of people in jail are male so, yeah I guess it is reasonably common.

Part two is going to be interesting. I just have a feeling.

This guy is the very opposite of an effective spokesperson for atheism. He just pisses of the faithful and entrenches their views. We need someone who will carefully methodically and rationally explain his points without making others feel as if he is insulting them.

This is not the best Bullshit episode. Although I agree with all of the conclusions presented, the video is basically a series of ad hominem attacks, insults and appeals to emotion rather than a serious skeptical show.

@tubewinkle Thank god there is someone with some common sense on these comments.

@AmericanSpeeches But only 9 before the Civil Rights Act of 1957, without which, the progress made under LBJ would have been much delayed.

It never ceases to amaze me what people with fertile imaginations can do with normal and innocent conversations.

I am not really sure what the problem with this video is. For once Bill seems to have had a reasonably fair and civil discussion on an interesting issue. I don't see Bill "attacking" Christian faith at all, just asking whether it is a good move politically to bring it up.

Don't get so defens...

At 23:33 , Nd3+ looks pretty good. You can't see everything I guess.

So are you allowing all comments now?

I think what you are getting at KC, and its something that I have thought about before, is that strategical elements are ways of playing so that you are more likely to have less tactical issues against you, and more in your favour. It is a substitute for calculating every single continuation on ...

Hi Maratrean!