Do you have any tatooes?

You will always be kewl in my book, what evs. How have you been? I am just sending out good vibes to all my commenters

oh no!!! i lost the support of some douchebag marxist on youtube? how will i ever sleep at night?

You like HowTheWorldWorks??? Unsub fucking scribed

@antivax, that's quite alright. my appointment with the snake oil salesman is next tuesday. thanks anyway for peddling your garbage science on my channel.

See my vids& learn herbs as dandlion,dock,kelp,coriander,d­ill,mugwort et :D

Yea... you don't get to call someone an "alarmist" because they respect a decade and a half, ever-solidifying scientific consensus behind global warming. I'm not denying that the "top scientists" in that field may have acted inappropriately, but that is in no way evidence that the peer review process is broken. Kinda B.S. that you focus on their behavior and don't put on iota of attention to the funded effort to protect the multi-trillion-dollar asset base of fossil fuel by smearing legitimate science over and over and over again. I've lost track of the number of legit peer-reviewed papers that have been misinterpreted by oil lawyers and spread as disinformation. I see exactly where your focus is.

Just unsubscribed, man. I've enjoyed the factual accuracy of your channel in the past, but I recently viewed some of your comments on greenman3610's video Energy Efficiency Part 2. You basically call out the entire peer review process governing climate change science as bologna because a few researchers got pissed off about a climate denier. It would seem a logical conclusion that these scientists are just humans that are aggravated about having their work dismantled by an aggressive fossil fuel industry; it wouldn't seem a natural conclusion that climate science's entire peer review system is broken... The worst part of your comments is that it's the same kind of ad hominem attacks used by funded deniers...

when thunderf00t first started promoting your stuff I thought you were a liberal. all this time..

Nah, I probably should have been more specific.
I find it worrying that people like tnoyy34rt see it as "posting misinformation" whenever someone disagrees with them. Without demonstrating it, it simply prevents civil discussion, and isn't a good way of convincing people of their own position when they didn't already agree with them.