cindygirlification's channel

chang has heart. Not many players can say ther've won a grand slam, Micheal can!

feminists, who's never ending goal of annoying men , have censored mens magazines and ended up hurting everyone.

notice how far back in the court agassi was. this is when he lost is way, failing too take the ball early , which was his point of difference.

an athletic serve & volley player will always be favored ,on a fast court with hard balls.These conditions are now only found in archive footage pre 2000.

islam is a spiritual, political and military movement which is fighting against the enlightenment that european relegions lost power too in the 1600's.

agassi looks like he's moving in slow motion compared too the likes of nadal, djokavic, murray and federer.

looking back on these single handed backhands, they look so fragile and unreliable esp. on the return.No wonder Aggasi looked so good by comparison.This was an indictment on the old coaches who taught what they used rather than the example shown by borg and conors!

Agassi's serve is too docile too consistently hold against pete. Gilbert was not the man too rebuild his serve, he didnt know how too serve either.Wining ugly only takes you sow far.

sampras didnt have the agassi mindset of working his opponent out of position.He played wining tennis, that is, from the serve to his volley and forehand he was looking to hit winners.Even on the run.

very informative, thank you for your insights!

serve and volley is the only way to beat an opponent with superior ground strokes like agassi and nadal, finish the points quick, win or lose off your own initiative.