calimar28's channel

READ THE RULES OF THIS CHANNEL BELOW, AND DONT BREAK THEM!

My channel is about truth, justice, and the American way. Debate is welcome, but no threats or vulgarity allowed. If you disagree, fine, that is free speech. But being vulgar or calling me names will not be tolerated. I WILL BAN THE OFFENDER. You have been warned.

One of the themes here is the immigration problem, espicially from the 3rd world. Too many negros and hispanics are allowed to pour in, and with 310 million people already here now, it hurts resources and is enviromentaly bad. Immigration needs to be cut back to 1962 levels. And all of these "browns" want entitlements, which only hamstrings our nation. Should we be importing more of these ethnics? They would be better off going to a communist country, like Vermont.

I have been to South Carolina recently and it is nearly wrecked by 3rd world immigration of hispanic and black origin (I give the Asian Indians a pass because they work hard and the new govenor is very conservative, as are most Indians, although they are as tight as a Jew).

The "Latinos" (AKA illegal aliens from Mexico), are all over the place. They are taking the jobs and spreading all over the state. These rascals and rabble rousers are supported by La Raza, which is an anti-white group. How long before dysentary breaks out in SC? Plus the Aztecs coming here from Mexico are brown, so they always want entitlements and will always vote liberal. We already allow more hispanics in legally than any other. 5 times more Mexicans are allowed in than Chinese and 10 times more Mexicans are allowed to immigrate to America than Canadians (why is this?), yet we are told by our leaders we need to legalize the illegals too.

I say cut out illegal immigration and cut legal immigration back to 1965 levels of 250,000 a year. Allowing 3 million a year in plus anchor babies and 80,000 refugees per year, is putting tremendous strain on our roads, bridges, sewers, waterways, energy needs, hospitals, schools, jails, etc. and we just cant afford it anymore. Time to put the army on the border.

Blacks that are already here are trouble enough, we do not need to import more. Many of these thugs go to prison or cause mahem or dropout of school. They are 13% of the population but 57% of the violent crime. There is something terribly wrong with that.
When debating once about this, I pointed out that even the illegal aliens are better than the negro's, and I got this amzingly insightful reply by a fellow YouTuber:

"Not by much - both are a bane to any society they infest & infect with their failure. Both over breed failure, request subsidy for their failure then bitch when they don't get it. Both groups fail to evolve & assimilate proper into the societies of their peers & superiors - thus any way you look at the situation - it's a losing battle for the superiors supporting the failures of evolution."

-TheTortugaTanker-

Another problem PLAUGING this nation, is the unions, espicially public unions. A quote from a fellow youTuber about public unions sums it up:

"To put citizens and taxpayers back in control of their governments, collective bargaining and forced union dues should be outlawed in the public sector. Every politician knows they can't pay the unfunded pensions but they are not willing to fix the problem because they are more concerned about votes then taxpayers or states sovereignty."

Another problem is taxes. What I say sums that up:

"Yes a flat tax is the only kind that is not illegal. When a politician runs, he says to 99% of the people "if you elect me, I wont raise your taxes, I will raise taxes on the other 1%". That is un-equal protection under the law. The 1% is not protected against the 99%, you see? The politician doesnt care about the 1%, because that isnt many votes...99% is. So he uses the money of the 1%, to buy the votes of the 99%, see? It's an illegal system we have allowed"

In fact, it says in the constitution that "taxes shall be leveled equally, throughout the land". The most conservative view on that meaning would be taxes should be the same percentage for everyone (flat tax). The most liberal interpetation of that part of the constitution would be "everyone should be taxed". But 47% of the people dont even pay any taxes. So either way you look at it, the constitution is being ignored. The Supreme Court should strike the tax code, but they havent. They have had 99 years to do it.

On that subject, the Supreme Court has also allowed president Obama to go to war in Libya without getting permission from congress, which is not allowed according to the constitution. Also, the Supreme Court allows districts to be shaped due to race, something else that the constitution does not allow. One must wonder what the Supreme Court does with it's time, if it won't defend the constitution from the over-reaching executive and legeslative branches?

less