Progress: The short answer is that it can't. A more nuanced answer is that you can have a "free market" without having "capitalism".

sick channel

hey. just want to say that u have a pretty nice channel with intresting videos. however im a bit puzzled by the premise of market anarchism. If there is no state, who protects the private property of the people operating within the free market? if anarchism is based on the idea that the state should be abolished how can a capitalist economy operate without the state?

HuBrIs...
great channel. thanks for the info.

which only* not which is only

They were anti-nihilist close enough, I will just lump all you anti-nihilists into one category and use the same generic approach on all of you. Really "we" (I use the term loosely) seek to tear down and destroy to change that which should be changed and do what we damn well please. So nihilists exist and you are going off a dictionary's explanation of nihilism, which is only vaguely describes some of what the philosophy of nihilism is.

I'm not even speaking in that context either.

The bourgeois definition of the nihilist as someone who wants only to tear down and destroy, the destructive annihilator, he cannot accept. A nihilist is rather one who refuses to recognize inherited, hand-me-down, conventional truths, but on the contrary has a will to one's "own critical thinking to empirical investigation." "Critical thinking" means for Bjørneboe an attitude where "nothing is sacred" in other words, a revaluation of all existing values and truths.

Nihilism's and anarchism's cognitive basis is radical individualism. Its very point of departure is thinking, the critical thought which revalues, i.e. "annihilates," all given facts. It is a process in which all "outward truths", all ideology, theory, abstraction, is peeled away.

Paraphrased from Kristiansen. Although I my self want to tear down and destroy that which should be changed to be honest but I agree with everything else.

You don't know what Nihilism is do you? It laid out the foundations for anarchy, you are kind of just going off of a general term.

Not one that consistently lives like one.