About ☾☆ FREEDOM & LIBERTY for EAST-TÜRKISTAN
ARMENIANS RACIST TERROR GOVERNMENT !!!
armenians racist terror government STOP LIE!!!
"アルメニアはファシズムを放棄せよ" (Japan)
*** (Armenia, Stop Fascism!!) ***
Armenia, stop Faschismus und Lügen-Propaganda!
亚美尼亚,中止法西斯主义! (Chin-v)
亞美尼亞,中止法西斯主義! (China-tr)
Armenië, stop het fascisme ! (NL)
L'Arménie, fascisme d'arrêt ! (fr)
Αρμενία, φασισμός στάσεων! (greek)
L'Armenia, fascismo di arresto! (Italy)
アルメニアの停止ファシズム!
아르메니아 의 정지 파시즘! (Korean)
Arménia, fascismo do batente! (Port)
Армения, фашизм стопа! (Ru)
¡Armenia, fascismo de la parada! (Spain)
ARMENIANS RACIST TERROR GOVERNMENT !!!
armenians racist terror government STOP LIE!!!
"アルメニアはファシズムを放棄せよ" (Japan)
*** (Armenia, Stop Fascism!!) ***
Armenia, stop Faschismus und Lügen-Propaganda!
亚美尼亚,中止法西斯主义! (Chin-v)
亞美尼亞,中止法西斯主義! (China-tr)
Arm...
Created by
barbaros01Pasa
Latest Activity
May 30, 2008
Date Joined
May 30, 2008
About this user
THE FOUR ?T? PLAN
The goal of Armenian terrorism that has never hesitated to go to such extremes as cold-blooded murder is to make the claims of genocide against Armenians heard and their demands known. The ultimate objective is a ?Great Armenia?, for which they designed the so called ? Four T plan? based on propaganda, recognition, indemnity and land. The intention here is to rehabilitate the world public opinion by making them to accept, through terrorism, the existence of genocide against them, to force Turkey into recognising it, to receive compensation in monetary terms and finally to seize from Turkey the land needed for realising a Great Armenia.
The claims underlying ?the Four T Plan? are the following:
The Turks invaded Armenia and seized its land.
They applied a systematic massacre against Armenians since the 1877-1878 war. They resorted to a planned genocide against Armenians from 1915 onward.
Talat Pasha issued secret orders to apply genocide on the Armenians. 1,5 million Armenians lost their lives through genocide.
It is necessary to make a brief study on the claims and the historical developments of Turkish-Armenian relations so as to understand how preposterous the insinuations are and which clandestine interests underlie them
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A SHORT REVIEW OF ARMENIAN HISTORY
The racial origins of the Armenians and the geography in which they lived are still debated today. It is certain, however, that they have always been the subjects of other states throughout history.
The encyclopædias state that Yerevan, Lake Sevan, Nahkichevan, north of Rumiah Lake and Maku region were called ?Armenia? which meant ? upper lands? and the people living there were named Armenians.
Some of the Armenian historians claim that they are descendants of the Hittites who lived in Cilicia and Northern Syria in the 6th century AD, while some others bring the genealogy to Haig, one of Noah?s sons. There is no certainty about exactly where the community referred today as Armenians settled and lived in the geographical region called Armenia. Their population and the percentage of their population to other groups that lived in the same area are still a mystery.
Thus, even the Armenian historians are not unanimous as to their origin. It may therefore be stated that it is impossible for a community that has never had the privilege of being a nation and founding an independent state, to have claims on a certain geography as ?a homeland?. Consequently, the dream of Great Armenia is but the product of an expansionist ideology.
As the history went, the Armenians lived under the Persian, Macedonian, Seleucide, Roman, Partian, Sasanite, Byzantine, Arabian and Turkish hegemonies. In fact, all of the Armenian principalities known to have existed in the region were established by the sovereigns that controlled the region in order to draw this community into their sphere of influence and employ them in a variety of tasks.
The Selchuks saved the Armenians from the Byzantine persecution and offered them the opportunity of leading a decent life when they secured the control of Anatolia in 1071. Under the reign of Mehmed II, freedom of thought and belief was granted to the Armenians and the right to establish a patriarchate of their own for governing the community?s religious and social activities.
The Armenian Patriarch had the power of appointing and dismissing clergy members, banning the religious rites, collecting dues from the community, concluding the marriage formalities and even pronouncing imprisonment decisions.
Until the end of the 19th century, the Armenians lived their golden age under the Ottoman rule, also with the vast tolerance of the Turkish people. Having been exempted from military service and of most of the taxes, they excelled in trade, agriculture, artisanry and rose to major posts in the administration. For the services that they rendered to the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians were allowed to settle in the regions vacated after the Greek rebellion and were given the prestigious title of ?the faithful nation?.
It ensues from the foregoing that there was not any Armenian issue until the end of the 19th century nor were any problems that the Armenian citizens could not solve with the assistance of Turkish administration.
Age
30
Country
United States
Interests
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HOW THE ARMENIAN ISSUE CAME ABOUT?
When the Ottoman Empire began to decline and was exposed to European interventions in many fields, deterioration began in the Turkish-Armenian relations. The Western powers then started to sever the Armenian community from the Ottoman community for attaining their own regional interests.
A number of European states that intervened in the Ottoman internal affairs under the guise of ensuring the introduction of reforms, organised the Armenians against the Empire. As a result of the provocations of the internal and external Armenian organisations as well as of the Armenian Church, this community gradually began to dissociate itself from the Turks.
Starting to fight against Turks under alliance with the Western powers despite all the good intentions of Turks, the Armenians initiated a campaign to present themselves as a subjugated society and to accuse the Ottoman Empire of ?having annihilated? their sovereignty rights in Anatolia.
As they lost their former privileges when the Moslems and non-Moslems were given equal rights under the Restoration Firman, the Armenians asked Russia not to withdraw from Eastern Anatolia that it had invaded during the 1877-1878 Ottoman-Russian war, to grant autonomy to these regions or to introduce reforms in their favour. This request of the Armenians were partially accepted by Russia and the Armenian issue was brought onto the international platform after Hagia Stephanos Treaty, signed at the end of the war; and also after the Berlin Treaty signed later. Thus, foreign countries that wanted to divide Turkey started to intervene in Turkish-Armenian relations. It is with these claims that the Armenian issue had begun to take shape and acquire an international character.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++