|
bamman5000 subscribed to AntiNRA
(1 week ago)
Rubber Bullets Are Safe, May 20, 2011.
I can't believe all the bad advice...
more
Rubber Bullets Are Safe, May 20, 2011.
I can't believe all the bad advice out there. Gun nuts trying to convince people rubber bullets are dangerous and real bullets are safe, is just complete insanity. One gun nut was trying to convince people, that a gun that shoots blanks could kill people, like it did that movie star and therefore we should all use real bullets. The gun that shoots blanks didn't kill anyone. It was the moron that was shooting the gun, that shot blanks, without reading the instructions. Rubber or less than lethal bullets called, "LTL's" have instructions, just like prescription drugs and automobiles. The Mercedes-Benz did not kill Princess Diana, it was the drunk behind the wheel that was speeding, combined with a bridge that was not designed for impact, like some bridges in America are. People are supposed to know you don't drive 80 when the speed limit is 50 . People are supposed to know you don't drink and drive. Bridge and infrastructure engineers are supposed to know highways and concrete bridges are not safe. It needs to be a impact barrier.
When a doctor prescribes a drug and the label says, "do not prescribe to people with this condition" and the doctor prescribes it anyway, it is called negligence. If the doctor knew it would kill people and prescribe it anyway, it is called premeditated first-degree murder. Yes Mercedes-Benz could have Made the car safer by putting air bags in the backseat and they probably do that now without being sued by Diana's family. Less than lethal bullets are just as safe as automobiles. They have instructions on how to use them. If the instructions say do not shoot at a certain distance, and the gun nut shoots anyway, he could be sued for negligence. Negligence for not reading the instructions, or he could be charged with premeditated first-degree murder, if he read the instructions, but thought he could get away with killing someone. Just like people are trained how to use a firearm , they need to be trained how to use less than lethal bullets or even guns that shoot blanks.
If your doctor knows you are allergic to strawberries and gives you strawberries, because he don't like you, and you die, he should be charged with murder. Because he is in fact a murderer. So if you purchase less than lethal bullets and the instructions say do not fire at a person less than 10 feet away, and you shoot it at a person who is 9 feet away, and it kills that person, you will be charged with premeditated first-degree murder and be put to death by lethal injection. Because either you're a complete idiot and should be put to death, or you knew it was going to kill that person and you wanted to see them die, which makes you more evil than Hitler.
I can't believe some of the comments on the web blog's and I hope the FBI is recording every one of them. People are saying, "you have to shoot a person with a rubber bullet first, before you kill him with a lead bullet or you will be charged with murder." It's not that you will be charged with murder, if you are contemplating how to kill someone, it is premeditated first-degree murder and you're going to have to deal with God in the afterlife. The FBI needs to record those web blogs, so when these gun nuts shoot someone with a rubber bullet and then with the real one after they have already posted on a website, that the only reason why they shot the person with a rubber bullet, was so that they would not be charged with murder, the prosecutors, judges and jurors need to hear this when sentencing this gun nut to the gas chambers.
I just sent a message to one gun nut blogger. Who is telling people not to use less than lethal bullets. This blogger needs to understand, that if he talks someone out of using less than lethal bullets and that person kills someone, he is liable to be sued by the person he advised. There's going to be a lot of lawsuits against bullet makers, gun dealers and publications. There will be a lot of job openings for lawyers. A lot of you gun nuts need to sue the NRA and the people who brainwashed you and used fear mongering to get you to purchase a weapon.
I must have heard 10 gun owners tell me they needed a gun just in case they come home from work and find some rapist raping their wives. As far as I know this is never happened in the history of mankind. Where are they getting this? Yes women have been raped. Rapists have been caught in the act. But never in history, that a man come home from work, see his wife getting raped, decide to run to the bedroom or wherever he stores his gun and run back and shoot or stop the rapist. It's like the guy who seen his child fall into the swimming pool and instead of jumping in to save the child, he ran into his house to look for a breathing machine he had. By time he got back the kid was dead. If a man is on top of your child raping them, you don't have time to run into the bedroom and get a gun.
less
|
|
~-~-~-~-~-No Bike Team~-~-~-~-~-
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
║║║║║║
╚╩═╩═╝□
╔═╦═╗
║╠╣║║
╚═╩═╝