alfuentesev's channel

@7t6e354r For the nth time, you'll have to provide a coherent definition of 'information' as you use the term, before discussion can proceed. You can't ... so I guess that's the end of your argument. Who gets to decide what's good and bad? We do, between all of us, as a society of individuals wi...

@Gordontrek So your god says, "I made you, I can break you" - Wow, sounds like he's copying lines from the Rocky Horror Picture Show. The god you're describing is insanely egotistical and fiendlishly megalomaniacal - creating "free" creatures whose only hope for salvation from eternal hellfire i...

@TheAudiorub But you think God is GOOD? Isn't lying a sin in your cult?

The ancient Greeks, when writing about their gods, genuinely believed that they were real. The same can be said of the accounts of gods, fairy tales, myths and legends around the world. Even if people sincerely believe (or at one time believed) those accounts to be true, that says absolutely noth...

@nealadamsdotcom You says it's a sign of intelligence to accept your views - that's incredibly arrogant, as well as a back-handed ad hominem argument. Then you (predictably) try to accuse me of watching cat fart videos (how boring, another ad hominem argument). Your debating tactics don't get mu...

@yummpyummp I guess I must be in denial then ... in denial of the existence of a mythical blood-thirsty, burning-bush impersonator who likes boinking virgins and condemning people to hell for disobeying their parents, working on Sundays, eating shellfish and wearing evil cotton-wool blends. Riii...

Craig = sophistry ... every single time. Quite tedious, and debating someone like that is about as interesting as debating a stone.

@ghjurx452 If someone bases their moral code on purely egotistical concerns - defining "good" as what is best for them - that would be subjective, but not arbitrary, in the sense of being capricious and unsupported by a coherent logic or motivation. If your morals are based on "me first, my inte...

@achilles1974 Jerry Bergman isn't exactly an impartial source (but people can check out his biography on Answers in Genesis and decide on their own). Most mutations, are initially neutral and stay idle in the genome. Most mutations with immediate effects are lethal, so they disappear from the poo...

@chersharni "Irreducibly complex organs could not develop through a slow gradual process".

Oh, but they have, many, many times. You're living proof, and so is every other living thing on the planet.

@mcilrain you missed a few words: "if (some) wolves breeding with (certain other wolves) result in (somewhat more doggy-like offspring that mate with other more doggy-like offspring over millenia and eventually lead to a new species called) dogs, (it's no surprise that wolves that didn't join in ...

@melis256 Cool video...