VWState's channel

@thundertonepj - I have no idea what you are addressing 12yrs graphics manipulation - NO SH!T!! ABOUT PARTS OF THE DOCUMENT ARE YOU SERIOUS?

.

"61 1054" all 800 DPI.........the last number "1" changed to only 200 DPI (optimized)

.

.By the way the last #1 is a far superior example of the Numb...

@nyatnagarl I did and you know it does do what i'm taking issue with - more later..

.

What about ROTATIONAL HISTORY?

.

This is one Single Line or form Printed Text..

"Signature" = 800 DPI....."of" = 200 DPI......."Parent" = 800 DPI

Are you telling me the Sanner Scanned "Signature" then stopped, chanaged resolutions for "of" then stopped, then changed it back for "Parent"

What is Fraud?

A false representation of a matter of fact

—whether by words or by conduct, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed

—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to his or her injury

Fraud is commonly understood as calculated...

Can you do one based on pixel issues in slide #3 here please?

See: OBAMA FORM STILL SHOWS MANIPULATION ( NO ONE REFUTES..)

Demonstrate ONE SCAN of the signed name Dunam where, the letter "D" is set 200 DPI and the rest of the signature "unam" is set at 2400 DPI?

Remember all in one Scan not ap...

Very thorough can you do one based on pixel issues in slide #3 here please?

See: OBAMA FORM STILL SHOWS MANIPULATION ( NO ONE REFUTES..)

Can you Demonstrate ONE SCAN of the signed name Dunam where, the letter "D" is set 200 DPI and the rest of the signature "unam" is set at 2400 DPI?

Remember...

NO ONE CLOSE TO REFUTING BELOW..

I agree I'm saying take OCR/Layers all out of picture - complex for most - much easier to see the pixels not matching all over the form. Extremely simple and very amusing to hear someone attempt to refute. They cannot tell you how - without human manipulation o...

NO ONE CLOSE TO REFUTING BELOW TO DATE..

I agree I'm saying take OCR/Layers all out of picture - complex for most - much easier to see the pixels not matching all over the form. Extremely simple and very amusing to hear someone attempt to refute. They cannot tell you how - without human manipu...

NO ONE CLOSE TO REFUTING BELOW TO DATE..

I agree I'm saying take OCR/Layers all out of picture - complex for most - much easier to see the pixels not matching all over the form. Extremely simple and very amusing to hear someone attempt to refute. They cannot tell you how - without human manipu...

NO ONE CLOSE TO REFUTING BELOW TO DATE..

I agree I'm saying take OCR/Layers all out of picture - complex for most - much easier to see the pixels not matching all over the form. Extremely simple and very amusing to hear someone attempt to refute. They cannot tell you how - without human manipu...

NO ONE CLOSE TO REFUTING BELOW TO DATE..

I agree I'm saying take OCR/Layers all out of picture - complex for most - much easier to see the pixels not matching all over the form. Extremely simple and very amusing to hear someone attempt to refute. They cannot tell you how - without human manipu...

NO ONE CLOSE TO REFUTING BELOW TO DATE..

I agree I'm saying take OCR/Layers all out of picture - complex for most - much easier to see the pixels not matching all over the form. Extremely simple and very amusing to hear someone attempt to refute. They cannot tell you how - without human manipu...