VERITS99's channel

@MYTHIRDSHADOW Weel, I agree that he's thumping out the notes with no sensitivity. I guess the player is in need of a bit of delicacy toward what he is playing. In this respect, I like Koopman (though sometimes he plays too slow.)

@TheBrandan6 It's the first movement of bwv 1013.

@Obe2525 Hating? Well, I didn't hate steel pans. Simply, I thought they were not quite suitable for classical music. My impression was wrong, of course.

@timurgran Do you mean "the worst" by "your "the badest"? Well, at least you should look up a dictionary before you append anything, unless you want to be considered a moron. Besides, there is nothing "bad" with the interpretation by teafruitbat.

@sermeister You may want to look for Koopman.

The soloists should have overlooked the "natural" for the twelfth notes in the bar 19 and bar 26, respectively.

@The010Snap Sounds like Trevor Pinnock and Kenneth Gilbert with the English Concert, but I'm not sure.

@pepeagudo >A little too quick, specially to be largo

Well, this piece is composed as "adagio", so the tempo by Kennedy is not too fast.

@Crazyguitarguy86 Then I look forward to the time you release BWV 1060R, hopefully early next year!

@Theonedue Well, I must confess that I have (slightly) changed my opinion toward Gould after watching the video "Thirty two short films on Glenn Gould" which a friend of mine sent me two weeks ago together with the copy of (almost) all CDs of Bach's pieces that Gould plays.

So, though I still pre...

This is not Concerto for 2 harpsichords, but is Concert for 3 harpsichords.

stercus pro cerebro habes.

This must be technically challenging! In fact Ton Koopman says this fugue is the most difficult piece of the WTC, book 1.

@vova47 The score published by Breitkopf & Härtel has no repeat.

Look up the IMPL database.

@daflowerbomb According to the booklet accompanying the CD by Harmonia Mundi, the recording was done in October 17-20, 1996 at the Blackhearth Concert Hall, London. For the record, the number of the CD is HMU 907155.

@necrotemor >the BWV number is wrong,

Note that the number is BWV 1060R where "R" stands for "reconstruction".

So far nobody has commented? It's really strange. I guess at least anyone trying to play this piece may better hear and listen to this.

音が、割れたというか歪んで聞こえるのが残念。或いはYouTubeの所為かもしれないが・・・

A=415 Hz ですか？随分凝ってますね。ところで、初音ミクというソフトウェア（？）についてはよく知りませんでしたが、サンプリングが人の­声のようですからこういう声楽曲にはよく合うのではないでしょうか。それにしても、Bachが蘇ったらどうコメントするでしょう­かね。案外彼自身のpolyphonyのイメージは此れに近かったかも知れませが。

@TheBwv565 Je vais traduire ce que vous avez dit en anglais.

May I translate this for you, YUKIO02225?

He says "Beautiful work !! :) The recercar of Bach is an incredible work! Come and talk on the FORUM JS BACH?"

@2bchristophe >Elles ont la meme beauté.

>La creation vient de Dieu

>L'homme n'est qu'un instrument.

Oui, vous avez raison...

@flamingice007 Gounod insulted Bach by stupidly inserting a redundant bar.