Profile
Channel Views:
5,063
Total Upload Views:
0
Age:
87
Joined:
Apr 3, 2009
Latest Activity:
1 month ago
Subscribers:
26
I have had a really odd epiphany. The NonStampCollector meme has made me aware that I actually do think of atheists as what they're not. I do think there is a difference among a Roman Catholic brand of atheist, a fundamentalist atheist, a Muslim atheist, and a straight up atheist.. I am the Catholic school, choir singing Roman Catholic atheist; my son is the straight up atheist - oops, sorry, non-theist, nonstampcollector type. He is in his 20's and says not raising him with any religion was the greatest gift I could have given him (that, and i never bought soda). He also believes I will never know the world as he does, because I will always have some residual Christianity. So I don't think I am wrong in seeing atheists as different types. The ex-fundamentalist may have the toughest row to hoe, primarily if they are creationists. At least Catholics don't have that burden! This has led me to actually soften towards Catholicism. A Catholic school education never hurt anyone.
About Me:
The thing that really chaps my ass about IDists, aside from the fact that there are almost certainly brilliant children who could make great accomplishments being mis-educated, is the related fact that this simplistic view reduces all the marvels and wonders of our planet and the universe or even universes to a child's story. How sad that everything is reduced to embarrassing simpleness. If there is a god, wouldn't (s)he be insulted? Taking this train of thought one more step; evolution and belief in god directly making humans are not mutually exclusive. There is a point at which something human is created. It's not even ridiculous to believe that there was divine intervention. People are unlike anything that has ever existed in 6 billion years. Evolution played out, I believe, 3 times almost from scratch, and nothing like a human, with our combination of intelligence, verbal ability and manual dexterity has ever lived on this planet (except the Nanderthals, who seemed to be well on their way). If you want god in the story, insert her there. The idiocy of creationism is no laughing matter - the waste of humanity that is lost with the children of these ideologues is a tragedy.
I have an opinion on everything, but that's only because I care so very, very much.
"When considering the truth of a proposition, one is either engaged in an honest appraisal of the evidence and logical arguments, or one isn't. Religion is one area of our lives where people imagine that some other standard of intellectual integrity applies."
~ Sam Harris
Hometown:
Hainesport, NJ
Country:
United States
Occupation:
Bartender
Schools:
Lebanon Valley Col., Boston U, Temple U, {B.A.} U of Akron Law {J.D.}, Rutgers Law
Interests:
Saving people from religion, music, parrots, cooking, leaving a small carbon footprint, politics, law
Movies:
Dr. Strangelove, The 6th Sense, A Beautiful Mind, Fight Club, Trainspotting, The Devil's Advocate, V for Vendetta, Daily Show, Colbert Report, Letterman, House, The Office, 30 Rock, Medium, Fringe, Bones
Music:
Just about everything, I love music. Classic rock roots, but I'm not stuck in a decade. I am all about the music, not so much devoted to bands, but I do like Dire Straits, Southside Johnny and the Asbury Jukes, Linkin Park, Foo Fighters, The Monkees (took off 3 decades, rediscovered then as an adult) - check out my Monkees playlist and sign the petition to get then in the R&R Hall of Fame. I really hope people listen to my playlists. I tried to get things you don't hear every day.
Books:
"To diminish the worth of women, men had to diminish the worth of the moon. They had to drive a wedge between human beings and the trees and the beasts and the waters, because trees and beasts and waters are as loyal to the moon as to the sun. They had to drive a wedge between thought and feeling...At first they used Apollo as the wedge, and the abstract logic of Apollo made a mighty wedge, indeed, but Apollo the artist maintained a love for women, not the open, unrestrained lust that Pan has, but a controlled longing that undermined the patriarchal ambition. When Christ came along, Christ, who slept with no female...Christ, who played no musical instrument, recited no poetry, and never kicked up his heels by moonlight, this Christ was the perfect wedge. Christianity is merely a system for turning priestesses into handmaidens, queens into concubines, and goddesses into muses."
— Tom Robbins
Subscriptions
(160)
Subscribers
(26)
Channel Comments
Recent Activity
|
|
TheSoSoAgnostic commented on Don't Cry Its Christmas
|
|
|
|
TheSoSoAgnostic liked a video
Christmas carol/advent hymn from Enya's album, And Winter Came...
I DO NOT OWN THE COPYRIGHTS TO THIS SONG Copyrights belong to WARNER MUSIC more |
|
|
|
TheSoSoAgnostic commented on North Korean Department store
|
|
|
|
TheSoSoAgnostic commented on North Korean Department store
|
|
|
|
TheSoSoAgnostic commented on Life in the People's Paradise of DPRK
|
|






























![Leonard Cohen - So long, Marianne [Studio Version] Thumbnail](http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/vZ61su9H5RU/default.jpg)


















Common chimps are Pan troglodytes whereas bonobos are Pan paniscus. They are not the same species. They do not breed in the wild because bonobos are geographically isolated from chimps; there is no gene flow.
Anyways, in my opinion, I think it is fine to call them bonobos. I know many anthropologists that call them bonobos. However, if you are worried about AronRa joining you can just call them P. paniscus and P. troglodytes and no one would be able to question it.
I just have to correct something on your About Me section of your channel. You state, One fun fact about evolution that doesn't get enough mention is that while we are the closest relative of the chimpanzee the inverse is not true. Our closest` relative is the bonobo.
We are equally related to chimpanzees and bonobos. We share a common ancestor with chimps and bonobos 7-6 million years ago (Ma). After our lineage split with theirs, chimps and bonobos then split from each other 3-2 Ma. This means that the closes living relative to chimps is bonobos, and the closes living relative to bonobos is chimps. However, our closes living relative is both the chimp and the bonobo.
2. I felt it was not directed at me because you not only did not find out what I was trying to say before you waded in, you did not give me enough conversation to tell which part of the very complex issue you were referring to. You were replying to his position, not anything I'd said.
Thank you for the apology, and sorry for responding so sharply (also, your subscription is much appreciated).