Oh no man you explain it fine. But ill check it out, you guys would surely have been capable developing it on your own. and what people dont get theyll be like "well the US failed badley without allies in Vietnam". The Goal of the Vietnam War was to prevent communism from spreading and to weaken and control it. WHICH WE ACCOMPLISHED. Some people dont understand things and they asume. what did they think the outcome would be in vietnam?

Wow i didnt know that lol. I dont see why people cant get along were both longtime great allies why the arguing. Mostly just immature people. But im surprised i didnt knwo the harrier was made more less by us.

Andi apologize for comments on the page sounding like an ass

Yeah i know, i just get angry myself when people like him say stuff about a country just because of their own anger. He seems kind of immature and not too knowlegeable. Yes Britian develops things for the F-35 but he acts like oh america doesnt do anything your just overated pricks. I agree with you that the challenger should be id say 4, and the leapord should be in there. But tommyboy doesnt realize that i nthis particuular thing they count numbers etc. If you had as many challengers like 1500 then you got my vote man. I mean people have different opinions, i say faggit to tom twice and he blocks me and posted 3-4 paragraph length comments, and dosnt let me respond becuz he blocked me. Hes so childish.

I respect your opinions sir', you seem knowlegeable. I rpelyed to your comment, i agree with you. Do you understabd where i come from when i say you need numbers, but i mean the UK doesnt need too many tanks. The US is the country that has enemies. It would just be overkill. But that Tom guy is making a fool of himself. Yet he hates america now because of my disagreement, yet i still love the british aand acknowlege your couregeous and great military. He is a biased person and a bad rep of the UK if you dont mind me saying sir;.

Of course british did, that comment wasnt meant to offend any body, and yes you supplied us with many other things as well we did to. The comment wasnt meant to be like brits dont do shit because you back us up and we do the same.

Yes but the RAF have a pair of there own but the merlin has been part of the RAF for many year abd to come.

The alleged reliability problems with the SA80 arguably stem from the creation of a precision rifle as a standard battlefield weapon. With the modifications now made, the British Army has an exceptionally accurate assault rifle, able to engage over greater ranges than equivalent arms, at cost of perhaps a more extensive maintenance regime than most similar weapons.

Some of the rifle's problems were corrected though modifications (e.g. the magazine release guard) but complaints over reliability in service continued.[5] The British Ministry of Defence describes the L85A2 revision as "modified in light of operational experience... the most reliable weapons of their type in the world".[8] Army trials had indicated extremely good reliability over a range of climates for various operational scenarios, though with a decline in reliability in hot, and especially hot and dry conditions.[9] Reports by HK suggested that over-zealous cleaning had a detrimental effect on the rifle. This includes using abrasives on parts not suited to them, as well as simple over-cleaning

The SA80 gained an initial poor reputation amongst British Soldiers and Royal Marines as being unreliable and fragile, a fact picked up by the UK media,[5] and entertainment industry.[7] The writer and former soldier Andy McNab said in his book Bravo Two Zero, that the British Army procured a "Rolls-Royce in the SA80, albeit a prototype Rolls-Royce".