-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@LHOdidntdoit Actually newtons laws were broken. First off the third law is the easiest to see. The one way crush down scenario is impossible. The "crushing" needs to happen both ways thus would destroy the upper block first arresting the collapse this is why controlled demolition is necessary.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
Of course the top would have fallen off. What you think all that mass tilted at 21 degrees is gonna stay that way and symmetrically crush the rest of the building LOL you're having a laugh right.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
Of course there were bombs they were recorded on seismographs.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
Fire doesn't melt steel or iron in fact. Nor does it boil lead.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
You can even see the squibs some 20 to 40 floors below the the initial demolition just in case you defuckers didnt get it.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
Obviously it was a controlled demolition. How else could it violate newtons laws.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@EdgemanLL2 Ironically the only thing you win at is losing.
-
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@EdgemanLL2 Then it would be subaerial derpface.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 LOL more of the black is white up is down logic from the debunkers. u are troll of trolls
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 aerial explosions won't be measured on a seismograph. Do you try?
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 palisades regularly measures the quarry where obviously explosives register.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Falling debris cannot create seismic waves even at stations 7km and 26km away i.e oklahoma city and kingdome. The only explaination is explosive demolition. The truck bomb was not coupled to the ground thus gave off an aerial explosion like the squibs in the upper floors of the to...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 LOL that because its not traffic its a subaerian explosion by the unique presence or rayleigh waves just like the wtc.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 They are clearly measuring explosions, falling debris does not create seismic waves recordable in this case even closer than 34km.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 LOL traffic doesn't create Rayleigh waves from subaerial explosions neither does falling debris and obviously the seismographs are more sensitive than what they thought they felt.
-
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 even if a seismic wave could be created in a metallic column, it would hit the ground in the form of a sound, and as the passage from metal to rock is a refraction that absorbs energy, there wouldn't be much left to propagate in the ground. steel is deformable. Elastically and pla...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 even if a seismic wave could be created in a metallic column, it would hit the ground in the form of a sound, and as the passage from metal to rock is a refraction that absorbs energy, there wouldn't be much left to propagate in the ground. steel is deformable. Elastically and ela...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 These two examples alfred p murray building and seattle kingdome matched the wtc, with a powerful subaerian explosion and the emitting of Rayleigh waves, and where the falling of the debris had no seismic consequences, even at distances under 34 km (less than 7 km and 26 km respec...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 None of these in any sense prove a dynamic load.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 the transformation of the kinetic energy into seismic waves would only make sense if we were dealing with a crash between two full, solid, and in-deformable objects.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Aerial explosions give off all of their energy in the air (P waves, or sound waves), and what remains upon hitting the ground - if it hits it - is thus too weak to create volume waves. Subaerian explosions give off an energy that splits into sound waves, mainly in the air, and sur...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Subterranean explosions are similar to earthquakes in that mechanical energy is transmitted to the earth in the form of volume waves (P and S) - either directly in the latter case, or by conversion of the waves due to a cavity in the former case - and surface waves (Rayleigh and L...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 The descending mass would also not be caught on seismographs considering the building below would deaden those waves. Also the falling mass was not responsible for the "collapse" considering it doesn't decelerate on "impact" with the structure below indicating no dynamic loading. ...
-
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Actually these types of readings are quite common with explosive events at palisades further pointing to controlled demolition. While we know that Shattered building material and dust can not create seismic wave that can be detected 34km away. Ruling this out the only other explan...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Obviously this was a controlled demolition. Even a normal person can clearly see the squibs some 20 - 40 floors below the initial demolition wave. These aerial explosions are clearly visible on most wtc videos which correspond with the already conclusive proof of controlled demol...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 LOL can u answer in any more assumption laden crap. You've not responded with any geophysical or any seismological evidence. YOU lose AGAIN.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 The impacting mass is not a dirac force that can create seismic wave up must be down for you.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 A subterranean explosion would not be heard in the air, but the ground would shake and initiate a series of waves (volume and surface waves), while if we hear an explosion, it is because it is either "aerial" and doesn't give a seismic signal, or it is subaerial and surface waves...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Or because its an aerial explosion and not subaeriel or subterranean.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Or because it was a an aerial explosion and not subaeriel or subterranean.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 , That doesn't hold water because in such a case we would have had a "square" signal of long duration and a constant amplitude, while in actuality we observe a "bell" signal, representing a strong and brief explosion, which is particularly evident in the case of WTC2.
-
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 instead of being similar as one would suppose from the official thesis which attributes the source of the seismic waves simply to the collapsing of the Towers, they are in fact very different from the point of view of their "form", their composition and especially their apparent s...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 We find in the figure for WTC7 where the calculation of the speed of the wave according to the determined point of origin is similar to a Rayleigh wave with a 2200 m/s speed. Note that the amplitudes are comparable to those of the waves emitted at the time of the "crashing" into ...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 these waves undeniably have an explosive origin. Even if the planes' impact and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude was insufficient to be recorded 34 km away, and they should have been similar.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Given that neither the crash into the tower nor its vibration, nor the fall of debris can be the source of the seismic waves registered 34 kilometres away, and that the low frequencies could not have been provoked other than by explosions.We are far from a Dirac-type force that ca...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 the magnitude attributed to the subterranean explosion at the WTC1 is ML=2.3 - comparable to the earthquake that hit New York January 17, 2001 (ML=2.4) - while the magnitude coming from the WTC2 explosion is ML=2.1, thus weaker, and this disparity - consistent with the explosions ...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 As to the theory of the oscillation of the Towers to explain these signal, it doesn't hold water because in such a case we would have had a "square" signal of long duration and a constant amplitude, while in actuality we observe a "bell" signal, representing a strong and brief exp...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Even if they were considerably amplified, these signals could not have been generated by the crashes into the Twin Towers - the actual waves generated by the crashes were deadened before hitting the ground (assuming that we were dealing with the same (low) frequencies). Frequencie...
-
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 t it is geophysically impossible to have two different propagation speeds for the same wave at the same frequency - because the surface waves are dispersive, which means that their speed depends upon their frequencies - traveling the same path at a few minutes interval, one must b...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 one of them generated the second Rayleigh wave four seconds after the first. The same thing happened at WTC7. A witness watching this tower heard something like a "thunderclap" that caused the windows to explode outwards, while the base of the burning building gave way a second la...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 As to the collapse of the Towers, we must distinguish between WTC1 and those of WTC2 and WTC7. Based upon the tips of waves coming from these last two towers, they underwent a very large "subaerial" explosion , heard by witnesses. For example, regarding WTC2, a fireman witnessed a...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 . It is impossible to get such a magnitude only from the falling of the debris, more especially over a duration of ten seconds!! Even if the entire tower had been compacted into a tight ball, it would have necessitated the speed of a meteorite, in any case, more than that caused b...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 Therefore we can affirm that explosions qualified as "subaerial" were set off close to the base of the Towers simultaneously with the crashes into each by the planes. The sound coming from these explosions would have been mixed with the sounds generated by the impacts of the plane...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 The composition of the waves is revealing both in terms of the location of the source and the magnitude of the energy transmitted to the ground. The subterranean origin of the waves emitted when WTC1 collapsed is attested by the presence of the P and S volume waves along with the ...
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 these waves undeniably have an explosive origin. Even if the planes' impact and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude was insufficient to be recorded 34 km away, and they should have been similar.
-
Schlaghammer commented 11 months ago
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
TAGS: World Trade Center United American Airlines Flight 11 175 77 93 WTC Building 7...
@MrSkunkwork100 A subterranean explosion would not be heard in the air, but the ground would shake and initiate a series of waves (volume and surface waves), while if we hear an explosion, it is because it is either "aerial" and doesn't give a seismic signal, or it is subaerial and surface waves ...
-
Review: LG WH10LS30K Blu-Ray Burner Drive and LTH Discs
This is a review of the LG WH10LS30K Blu-Ray Burner Drive, if you have any comments or anything, feel free to post. I also talk about the Optical Q...
4,432 views
Schlaghammer said:
@themo8370 i've just put the .mkv into nero blu ray and burn from there so i don't think so.
Review: LG WH10LS30K Blu-Ray Burner Drive and LTH Discs
This is a review of the LG WH10LS30K Blu-Ray Burner Drive, if you have any comments or anything, feel free to post. I also talk about the Optical Q...
4,432 views
Schlaghammer said:
I tried burning some .mkv files to memorex bd-r and play them on my rca blu ray player and i burned them with nero 10 and it keeps saying that is unsupported format. Do you happen to have any idea what i could be doing wrong?
+ View allshow less