@wingchundragon ... That's a KEM not a Steenbeck. Back then, just like today, editors would argue endlessly about the relative merits of each editing system. KEMs worked better with 35mm film and were the equivalent of the modern Avid. Steenbecks worked better with 16mm film were the equival...
@wingchundragon ... That's a KEM not a Steenbeck. Back then, just like today, editors would argue endlessly about the relative merits of each editing system. KEMs worked better with 35mm film and were the equivalent of the modern Avid. Steenbecks worked better with 16mm film were the equival...