www.replytodawkins.com

http://www.atlasofcreation.com
http://www.darwinism-watch.com
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com
http://www.darwinistpanic.com
http://www.fossil-museum.com/fossils
http://www.grievingdarwinists.com

You've turned down Mr. Adnan Oktar's face to face debate offer by bringing along scientific evidence. Now you only debate secondary school children and priests. If you're after victory, you'll be ashamed. Would it be a victory to defeat a priest, who has no information about Darwinism? Sooner or later, you will confront Mr. Adnan Oktar. What are you going to do then?

Your works feel show intended, you keep claiming you're an African ape. Whereas you know your grandmaster's explanation on this matter. "But then with me the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, ARE OF ANY VALUE or AT ALL TRUSTWORTHY. Would any one TRUST IN THE CONVICTIONS OF A MONKEY'S MIND, IF THERE ARE ANY CONVICTIONS IN SUCH A MIND?"


We Challenge Dawkins To A Discussion Before The Public

Richard Dawkins, a most ardent supporter of Darwinism, has long accounted for the perfect creation of the universe in terms of the theory of evolution, which has lately suffered a global collapse. In his recent writings and interviews, however, Dawkins has started to express that "life cannot form by chance." It is an absence of sense and reason to support evolution on one hand and to state that life cannot come about by chance on the other. That is due to the fact that according to the theory of evolution, which Dawkins supports, the existence of life is based on entirely random coincidences.

Dawkins has realized that he can get nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical impasse as he basically claims that "evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences." What he should realize is that demagogy no longer works.


What Richard Dawkins Fails to Realize!

One of the main effects of the magnificent work known as the Atlas of Creation that has evoked responses from all over the world is this: even the most ardent Darwinists have begun doubting their theory. Richard Dawkins is perhaps the greatest and most visible example of this.

Richard Dawkins, who has constantly and deliberately reiterated the idea that "life cannot form by chance" in all his recent writings and interviews, makes his change of heart apparent by clearly and distinctly rejecting the fundamental claim of Darwinism, the idea of chance. This is the effect of the unequivocal and irrefutable evidence of creation represented by 100 million fossils, some of which are shown in the Atlas of Creation, that demolish the concept of evolution. Yet the majority of long-standing Darwinists, who have dedicated their whole lives to a lie and a false theory, are unable to bear the burden of having been deceived and having misled others for so many years. They therefore attempt to justify themselves and their false theory by always resorting to demagoguery and false arguments. They are unable to admit their defeat and find it difficult to say "I made a mistake." Yet this is actually very natural and easy. Human beings can make mistakes, and the virtue of putting one's errors right after having become aware of them is most praiseworthy.

But Richard Dawkins has so far failed to do this.

Although he has rejected the idea of chance, he has still gone down a highly irrational and illogical path by resorting to explanations that are no less groundless and devoid of logic. In his accounts, Dawkins says that organisms cannot form by chance, but resorts to the same demagoguery by instead trying to portray such a blind process as natural selection as a conscious entity. Instances of classical Darwinist demagoguery are set out in this site, based on statements by Dawkins.

less