-
13 hours ago
RC Sproul Interviews Stephen Meyer, Part 3 of 5
RC Sproul sits down with Stephen Meyer, author of the book, "Signature in the Cell", and they discuss philosophy, evolution, education, Intelligent...
LigonierMinistries • 7,497 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
-
1 week ago
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution pt3
NOVA special on Dover high school's board trying to get "Intelligent Design" taught in school along side Evolution.
Full story at:http://www.pbs.o...
thermionicemission • 10,708 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t ...
-
1 week ago
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution pt1
NOVA special on Dover high school's board trying to get "Intelligent Design" taught in school along side Evolution.
thermionicemission • 14,979 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t ...
-
2 weeks ago
Journey Inside The Cell
http://www.discovery.org This animation shows how the digital information encoded in DNA directs protein synthesis inside the cell and provides a u...
DiscoveryInstitute • 337,106 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
@OnlyBlix Clearly, you won't take my word for it, so how about Stephen J Gould`s (foremost scientist of the 20thC) - "Evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are ...
-
2 weeks ago
cop gets owned guy makes him look stupid
cherold606 • 415,156 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
One of these people is a calm and reasonable man wishing to engage in an exchange of ideas, and the other is a cock.
-
2 weeks ago
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 2 / 7
Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presen...
VipChannel • 88,843 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t su...
-
2 weeks ago
Bacterium Flagellum Motor
Flagellum Motor
mikedolding • 24,894 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t su...
-
2 weeks ago
RC Sproul Interviews Stephen Meyer, Part 5 of 5
RC Sproul sits down with Stephen Meyer, author of the book, "Signature in the Cell", and they discuss philosophy, evolution, education, Intelligent...
LigonierMinistries • 6,362 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t su...
-
2 weeks ago
RC Sproul Interviews Stephen Meyer, Part 2 of 5
RC Sproul sits down with Stephen Meyer, author of the book, "Signature in the Cell", and they discuss philosophy, evolution, education, Intelligent...
LigonierMinistries • 9,275 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t su...
-
2 weeks ago
DNA - God's amazing programming; proof for his existence
The discovery of DNA and it's marvelous blueprint of programming to build God's creatures is one of the many proofs that God does indeed exist. It...
KingJamesBible • 11,532 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t su...
-
3 weeks ago
Mathematical proof for Intelligent Design
This is for people who rates Scientific knowledge to above God,the creator.
Through this video, Science itself confirms the existence of God
Imanuels • 33,803 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t suc...
-
3 weeks ago
Irreducible Complexity? The Bacterial Flagellum
A clip from the NOVA production, "Judgment Day."
skreeeboy • 14,392 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t suc...
-
3 weeks ago
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 6 / 7
Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presen...
VipChannel • 23,314 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t suc...
-
3 weeks ago
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 7 / 7
Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presen...
VipChannel • 27,487 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t suc...
-
3 weeks ago
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 4 / 7
Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presen...
VipChannel • 37,693 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t suc...
-
3 weeks ago
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 3 / 7
Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presen...
VipChannel • 51,201 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
A question for the ID proponent.
If something is so complex that it must require a designer (which I understand is the basic tenet of ID), and the example of, say, DNA is used to make the point, then there must also exist something so simple that it DOESN`T require a designer. If there isn`t suc...
-
1 month ago
Intelligent Design Theory
Intelligent Design Theory. Another video clip from our friends at http://www.IllustraMedia.com - Unlocking the Mystery of Life.
Intelligent Design...
reflect7 • 11,798 views
RationalThinker1859
commented:
@bellhog246 The procedure, yes. The definitions, yes. Mr Dembski's words, yes. And amongst all that, I still haven't been given what I originally asked for - AN EXAMPLE OF TESTING!
Librarian? I have looked, I have asked, I have wondered, and yet I still can't find an example of a test that can b...
About Collecting the good, the bad, and the downright stupid.
OK. Come on. Let's get real about things. Either you lean towards believing the evidence or you lean away from it. To lean towards is rational, to lean away isn't.
If you don't like or trust or understand or believe evidential science then don't go to a doctor the next time you are ill. Go to a priest instead.
It is the strangest thing to hear 'evolution never happened' based views. Evolution is as established a fact as light travels in waves, but we never hear 'if you believe light travels in waves then you are brainwashed into a false belief system' do we? Why is that?
Why are people comfortable with 'light travels in waves' but uncomfortable with 'species change'?
OK. Come on. Let's get real about things. Either you lean towards believing the evidence or you lean away from it. To lean towards is rational, to lean away isn't.
If you don't like or trust or understand or believe evidential science then don't...
Created by
RationalThinker1859Latest Activity
Mar 2, 2012Date Joined
Sep 29, 2008About this user
Willfully ignoring science because it interferes with a Bronze Age set of myths and stories is, frankly, cause for alarm.And inventing non-science to conform with a Bronze Age set of myths and stories is, frankly, even more alarming.
I`ve posted Potholer`s `made easy` series to get things started, and will gradually add more of the good, the bad and the downright stupid as I gather it.
@revo1974 " a Universe that exhibits profound order, harmony and regularity"
I've said, I can agree with this. The universe is (profoundly!!) regular. It's the next leap that I believe you are making that I can't make - the conclusion that regularity requires intention or purpose or design. It m...