@ArcanaKnight It isn't a minor point. Baillieul misled the reader. Was it on purpose? Your point suggests that it was, since "commonly" suggests that Baillieul knew there were exceptions, exceptions that refute his point, exceptions he failed to disclose.
@SymphoDeProggy What many do not realize is that the dates are often made to sync with preconceived ideas, so it isn't enough for someone to just assert that various dating methods all agree.
To illustrate my point, see educatetruthDOTcom /la-sierra-evidence/radiometric-dating-can-be-very-tuff w...
@iclb00285 I would think that true science, in search of truth whatever it might be, would be open to the possibility of the activity of God, rather than assume that God never interacted with His creation, and that everything can be explained as if God does not exist.
@ArcanaKnight It isn't a minor point. Baillieul misled the reader. Was it on purpose? Your point suggests that it was, since "commonly" suggests that Baillieul knew there were exceptions, exceptions that refute his point, exceptions he failed to disclose.
On the other hand, if Baillieul was igno...