Phyerbyrd's channel

@theDracoIX Neph did not simply claim that the proteins were different; he suggested that the proteins were different in a way that was not what we would see if humans and chimps shared an ancestor. This is not so for the reasons I put forth in my previous comments. Since organisms are predicted ...

@blicksflicks "Pink" is a property of an object that reflects a certain wavelength of light, and if something reflects light, it will by definition not be invisible, as "invisible" implies that there is no visual indication of it's existence, and if light in that spectrum is reflected off of an o...

@rbeasley123 I also have a few nitpicks i feel should be addressed.

1. Not all atheists enjoy fantasy and science fiction, and i see no reason why all of them would.

2. X-men is science fiction, and while the science in it is incredibly soft, it does not claim to be above nature.

3. being an athe...

If the examples provided in one of his videos is any indication, he defines form and structure as what organs an organism possesses. He used such examples as eyes, ears, eyebrows, cecal valves, etc. These are anatomical features, not morphological features. In fact, virtually everything that ever...

What if the objections raised are valid?

What about my scenario, would that prove anything or would it be just like the others?

A transitional fossil shares homologous features with two or more taxons of animals. Going by the general rule in biology that homology and relatedness are corellated, it stands to reason that a fossil as described above is related to the two groups. For example, Archaeopteryx has many traits ass...