Peaches1822's channel

I actually liked the song at the beginning (seriously) what is it?

3:10 is just pure doubles class really

@musictime247 I agree he's influenced the game with his ball striking, but he is not a natural ball striker. Safin and Nalbandian are classic examples of ball strikers, sampras and agassi were great ball strikers, but because somebody doesn't make a lot of unforced errors doesn't mean they are a ...

I think the music and the constant replays have ruined these highlights

@DjTokenMusic I figured that might be the case, though you confirming it has almost shattered my first impression

I found this difficult to masturbate too, but I still managed.......

@youziness I'm not sure the phrase 'its good for tennis if nadal loses often' demonstrates any knowledge of the sport in any spectrum of time. My comment was nothing along the lines of what you just said. Thanks to federer AND nadal, the movement required at the top of the game is like nothing an...

@arazzon long to challenge a ball, either way, umpires consistently get their job wrong, so just because you have played a similar role and understand the pressure of the situation, does not mean that your right about how well the umpire performs. He is either right in this instance, and wrong in...

from 3:54 to the end of the first set, I don't think I've ever seen anyone hit forehands that hard consistently

@Globox822 given there are different levels of seriousness of mono, it is safe to assume that if federer had it, which I can't think why he'd lie about it publicly, it would have affected his game somewhat. That is not to say that djoko would not have beaten him that day, cos the entire tournamen...

@Gbax13 I did enjoy the 09 wimbledon final. A match that was literally decided on 1 break of serve (okay, and maybe one point). So a happy medium would be good, but I get the point. Plus, today is better for spectators, which if it gets more people watching, I am all for, cos I personally don't t...

5:25 was a match point

The man who speaks fluent english and has done for years is the guy who completely messes it up, brilliant

@hawaiidispenser I do kind of agree, but you don't need to tell me about the physics on a tennis court. The main give away for me is the flight of the ball, it dips loads at the very end. The point that federer won where djokovic hit a similar angle had a more uniform flight path, where this one ...

What happened?? All I remember is Benneteau serving and when I woke up murray had won the point ;)

these two could really motor round a tennis court

@theboyfrommiddlesbro it is unfortunate what happened to Britain's manufacturing industry, but given the rise of China and its ability to produce the things it can at the stupidly low costs, and the fact the coal is going to become a virtually extinct fossil fuel. What she did was going to happen...

my only problem with these highlights is because djokovic doesn't win a single point (don't worry, cos I expected that given the title). The reason why, isn't because I wanted to see both men be equal because it was an amazing match. It is just a bit unexciting know that nadal is gonna win every ...

I could watch this for hours

was I the only one who thought rafa's grunting was quieter than usual?

@TheWinnie2010 ha, I lol'd when I saw that

@3timeMVPNash maybe the one thing missing in this match :)

did anyone else constantly replay murray's 1st set point thinking it was them? :)

I truly hate to sound like a philosophy major (also given i'm pro fed), but Noah is right. Tennis is experiencing 2 of the all time greats playing each other at their respective peaks (yes they have missed each others by a few years, but it is so rare either way), we can just cream over the tenni...

@williamstdog9 Borg with old racquet technology, nadal with the new (maybe). IMO nadal is an unbelievable player, but has been helped massively by slower courts and the better technology of strings, but that is obviously speculation :)

4:22 to 5:10 is maybe my favourite sporting moment ever

I love roddicks reaction at 5:07, pure passion

2:17 - Cool Whhhhip? :)

i'm not sure I liked the second tweener. I don't mind them when you have no other choice like federers, nadals and murrays first one, because they literally had almost no other choice. The one at the end..........im just not sure, if he over ran it, its brilliant, if it was pre determined thought...

I never 'enjoyed' watching pete hit ground strokes, but the stuff he could do to a tennis ball was just ridiculous

@oplilium lets say roddick would have not played federer in the AO 09 semis, no one then says "had roddick not beaten federer, he would have won the tournament", cos he would of played nadal. He does have very limited talent, but he is one of the hardest workers on a tennis court I have seen in t...

I mean..........4:37 with a one handed backhand in the final of the masters cup.....its a bit silly really