Nekrohol's channel

The Great Apostasy has landed!


I am a Traditional Roman Catholic who holds the Sedevacantist position, which is currently the only true and Catholic one to hold; all other positions lead to compromise, heresy, schism and/or otherwise denial of one Dogma or another.

So I obviously consider the last 5 "popes" as antipopes and heresiarchs; I reject the Vatican II "council" as a phony trick of the Devil rife with heresy and apostasy.


Galatians 1:8-9: "BUT THOUGH WE, OR AN ANGEL FROM HEAVEN, PREACH A GOSPEL TO YOU BESIDES THAT WHICH WE HAVE PREACHED TO YOU, LET HIM BE ANATHEMA. 9 AS WE SAID BEFORE, SO NOW I SAY AGAIN: IF ANY ONE PREACH TO YOU A GOSPEL BESIDES THAT WHICH YOU HAVE RECEIVED, LET HIM BE ANATHEMA."

The Catholic Church cannot contradict Herself, nor can any Pope universally promulgate heresies to be "believed" by the faithful, nor bind them to them, nor can any Ecumenical Council of the Church, which is infallible and which Vatican II would have been had it been a real Council (which it was not), contain the slightest heresy or error; infalliblility means that there isn't even a *chance* for there to be error, not that there simply isn't; but that's EXACTLY what happened with Vatican ll: it attempted to "teach" and "decree" as sound Catholic teaching, doctrines that had already been condemned by the Church as heresy, such as false ecumenism (read Mortalium Animos by Pope Pius XI), Religious Liberty, Salvation outside the Church, a completely heretical and apostate ecclesiology of the Church, praising of false religions of the Devil, and much, much more; and that's also exactly what the last 5 antipopes have been attempting to do: promulgate, "teach" and "decree" heresies, error and apostasy to the whole Catholic World, and that, my friend, is simply impossible and tantamount to saying that God Himself can teach us heresies and errors as "Catholic doctrine".

This argument alone proves the sedevacantist position, without even getting into the issue of whether the so-called "popes" are heretics or not, which they most certainly and undoubtedly are, they are so wicked!

If Paul Vl was a true Pope (which he wasn't), the Gates of Hell prevailed over the Church when Vatican ll was solemnly "approved" by him, for it would mean that the Church contradicted Herself and that She defected, which can't happen.

Since we know that that is impossible, what we do know that CAN happen and is possible, however, and which is in fact the teaching of the Church, is that a Pope can lose his office through public/explicit heresy, or that a heretic may be posing as the Pope.

Nothing like this, not even close, has ever happened in the history of the Church, namely, that a purported Pope or Council attempted to teach a heresy or an error to the whole Catholic world and bind them to it, not ever; but anti-sedevacantists will raise certain objections like Pope John XXII(22), Liberius, Honorius or Virgilius, as "examples" of Popes teaching heresy and remaning Popes, but the problem with such examples is that one requirement or another for it to constitute a manifest/universally taught heresy simple wasn't there, since in the first case, the Beatific Vision wasn't even defined at that time, and the Pope offered it as his mere opinion; in the second, heretics falsely accused Pope Liberius; in the third, his letters were unknown during his life and were only found after his death, but he never taught it alive and they condemned him as a heretic later anyways; and in the last one, he never even formally adopted the alleged compromises he was accused of, nor taught them to anybody. This is a simple summary of these cases, but anyone can check the Catholic Encyclopedia or other sources for the full story.

less