MrXenitha's channel

@JagCreed4 "But Hitler believed in natural selection and murdered 5 million people he saw unfit to live!"

That's not natural selection, that's artificial

@thephilosophylover Indeed lol

@1tabligh The analogy of the war front idea is clever but it only refers to Newton's classical mechanical laws. To answer this question we must enter the reality of Quantum mechanics.

i.e. the condition of someone saying "don't attack until they do" is simultaneous to another probability of anot...

@theist77 "Just because God knows what you WOULD do or WILL do does not take the WOULD or the WILL out of the sentence"

Then I guess that makes God sadistic.

@JesusgavemeHolySpiri "just said its interesting to note" Don't forget that the Roman Empire was the strongest empire that ever existed in classical history and they didn't believe in the Christian God.

Anyway, all I wanted to say is that you shouldn't go round shouting your opinion to other pe...

580 Maths Students who know the fundamentals of Pure Mathematics

1,671 Who think they know the fundamentals of Pure Mathematics

Research it before you comment.

1=.0.(9) is not a proof for an inequality, it is a proof for another identity of an integer

@tob910 That's not all true.

√9=3 not ±3, when we take the squreroot of a real number, we take the positive root always.

To get the -3 we need to define 9 as a square in a quadratic equation:

x²=9, thus x must have two solutions, now put in the standard quadratic form:

x² - 9 = 0

(x+3)(x-...

@Toaderiffic He didn't have to say 0 had a sign. the statement x=-x is true and only true for when x=0, factoring out x proves that 0 still have no sign:

x=-x

1(x)=-1(x)

x can equal -x if and only if x=0

@goffymew56 I'm not sure about the fur but it does not matter whether it is dead or alive; curently scientists are going to revive the extinct wooly mammoth for research.

But this isn't my field of science lol

@DeadeyeDragoon If 1/3≠0.333... recurring then what is it equal to? There are no numbers lying between 0.(3) and 1/3, thus the difference when subtracted is 0 ∴ 1/3≡0.(3).

Look at it logically, if 1≠0.(9) then:

1-0.(9)≠0.000... however this is not true because 1-0.(9)=1/∞⟹0 because to define th...