MrLincolnj's channel

@MultiUniv3rsal I don't think he's as rational as you make it seem. He really has a problem with sticking to the point. And his need to impress people with flummery and pointlessly inflated rhetoric certainly takes precedence over his sense of consecution and logic. Another thing is that he just...

@YouKnowIAmRight Tut, tut, what a shocking temper you have! Sigh all you Nazi's have such a limited repertoire of arguments, Really so disappointing!..but not unnatural for people of your level. Pity the rest of the hopeful, forward-looking, good-natured world has to put up with primitive types l...

What a waste of space this man is! Pity he wasn't jailed indefinitely in Austria, and the key thrown away. What an excremental mind!

@bigderekkeene

Also, would you listen to a man who says, in full sentences and in print, that Hitler wasn't aware of the Concentration Camps and didn't know that Jews were being gased en mass, and think to yourself, "here's a man who is a great historian"? The same man speaks of Hitler in laudat...

@TheDwnndog 'Proper Historian' my foot! He's a purveyor of lies and fiction - demonstrated by many able genuine historians. Irving is a NON-historian - an embarrassment and a disgrace to the profession of historiography. He's a charlatan and a joke. The so-called 'original material' that he claim...

@lynchie3000 And you accept that judgement unquestioningly? Are you blinded by the 'eminence' of the judge? Read more about the outright lies purveyed by Irving, and you'll form a different view, I guarantee you. Malicious drivel like claiming that Churchill's speeches were 'spoken by an actor be...

@JihadAeon I agree heartily with your sentiments! But I think it would be bizarre to call him a scoundrel. He had principles and zest, boundless energy and magnanimity, and didn't know the meaning of the words 'fear' or 'surrender', he was ambitious and inconsiderate; but heartlessness, meanness,...

@EricDavidFloyd Your parents' or grandparents' generation might have valued Freedom, and the man whose indomitable spirit saved it for us, more than you do - because they, unlike you, were in imminent danger of losing it, and had to fight tooth and nail for it. It is so easy to take Civilisation ...

@nakedmambo To 'reason' you need to think logically: this seems difficult for you. Hitchens' intellect isn't bad as intellects go, even if it isn't exactly admirable. but his ungainly attempts to smirch Churchill's name and fame is an exercise in futility, even as it is one in baseness. Hitchens,...

@hermando29 You are right comrade. Isn't is odd how the Americans pontificate about how they 'saved the Brits'? USMCpatriot100 is right. That the US profiteered from the war cannot be denied. They undoubtedly gave many of their finest young men to the conflict, but there should be no illusions ab...

It's easy to guess Elberiver's political class and sympathies, is it not? Obviously the Nazi party still has its adherents!

Ergo, it is also the most dangerous. Even more significant than this, to argue that if religion were removed people will gravitate towards other lethal fanaticsms is a logical non-sequiter that anyone with half Hitchens' intelligence and wit could destroy in a matter of minutes. It is the idiotic...

The more I listen to him the more I tend to agree with Leon Weisetler's assessment of Hitchens as a 'buffoon'. Hitchens picks on a valid point that Grayling makes here to aim a cheap shot at Churchill. Hitchens' inferiority complex about Winston Churchill is stupendous, and sticks out like a sore...

@manthasagittarius

That sounds very reasonable, doesn't it, manthasagittarius? - until you dissect the so-called documentary knowledge in which he is 'steeped'......As has been demonstrated in relation to Irving's dramatic assertion about an actor having recorded Churchill's speeches for him. Ir...

His feelings towards Churchill were that of a pigmy towards a giant – feelings of abiding inferiority, and rage that Nature had cast him in a role so decidedly second-rate. David Irving and Alan Brooke might have been blood-brothers. What a pathetic apology for a historian!