Nice channel!

WWE or TNA?

Are you a big Kayne west fan. I just wondering cause of the background

MrJuventino1987 Subscribe

ahem, not a kid. I'm 24 lol. When I think of kid, I think of lack of experience/knowledge. Although there are kids that are knowledgeable. I appreciate that you challenged my mind. I needed that.

Maybe I could use some debate lessons from you, then? I gotta give it to ya, you can hold a strong debate but not strong enough. I lost motivation to keep this debate going. You should make some wrestling vids or something. I ended this debate because it wasn't going anywhere. The attitude era had its pros and cons. Can we agree to that?

This isn't a competition. Of course you're going to say that my argument "holds no water" because you're the one that's arguing with me. You don't want to be proven wrong. Please, don't view this as a competition because it's far from it.

With that said, the attitude era came about because hardcore style was popular with adult males. I believe that hardcore matches show no skills because it's just wrestlers cracking skulls with weapons. This is the argument. I have a good friend who watched wrestling in the 70s and he told me that the attitude era was overrated and it was based on hardcore matches. Yeah, but that didn't really draw ratings. Austin and the Rock drew ratings. Not the hardcore matches itself. Look it up. Yeah, it's entertainment but it went on for too long! I liked the AE, but I liked it because of Austin.

@ hambalony

I know plenty of people that realized that the attitude era didn't need hardcore wrestling. Just because I disliked the hardcore style doesn't mean that nobody didn't like it either. Am I right or wrong? There's no way that EVERYBODY liked the hardcore style. They got rid of the hardcore style in 2002 when the hardcore division died down. There was NO point. The only hot wrestlers going on in the attitude era were austin, rock, HHH, angle,jericho and taker. Everybody else were forgotten. Besides the light-heavyweight division, there weren't any memorable wrestlers. The only hot feud was austin and mcmahon. They revolutionized wrestling. There were so many pointless gimmick matches that involved the hardcore lifestyle. Pro wrestling fans want to see WRESTLING. Every era has its pros and cons. Just sayin!

All of a sudden, I'm a minority, eh? Yeah, im in the minority of a wrestling fan that speaks his mind. Like I said, Im not a wagon jumper. :)

@hambalony

The hardcore title and the european title was mostly for mid-carders. But most hardcore champs were former world champs. Angle, Taker, Kane, Foley, big show, jericho, jeff hardy, RVD, shall I go on? The attitude era had plenty of hardcore matches. For example, First Blood match, Last Man Standing match, Boiler Room Brawl, backstage brawl, TLC, tables match, Inferno match, stretcher match, etc... Like I said, the WWF wanted to compete with WCW; therefore, they knew that the hardcore lifestyle worked well with adult fans. It was constant hardcore matches. However, the attitude era did have lucha libre matches. That was the ONLY reason why I liked the attitude era, besides watching austin and the rock. And I'm not going to call you a muppet just because I disagree with you. But if it makes you feel better about yourself then I'd suggest you find a different way to deal with your criticism. Just sayin'.

@hambalony

yes, i can't STAND hardcore wrestling. I couldn't keep up with who had the hardcore title. Hardcore wrestling involves no skills. I'd rather see technical wrestling. OH NO! He hates hardcore wrestling! I'm not a real wrestling fan. Bitch please lol