MrGregster17's channel

2:05 BOOBS!!!

Everybody rushes in thinking how much do I get?

Why did they induct this version of the horsemen? What about originals Ole and Gene Anderson. Sting and Lex Luger were also horsemen and even Sid Vicious.

@SeanStrife Just calling it as I see it and this was totally ridiculous.

Tonight you're coming?!?

The wariior was considered before I beleive but declined. Very doubtful about Benoit. the wwe didn't even acknowledge his existence anymore after the murder suicide came to light.

@MrGregster17 Do some research like I did.

Just send me $10 and I will give you a free easy money making system.

Too out of focus to see anything.

Throw something at it and get it to move.

There was snow on the ground and yet they don't say anything about footprints. Seems weird to me. That would be the first thing I would look for.

A bus full of tourists and no one got a pcture?

@DumDDumDum I watched your other videos. I still say you are seeing what you want to see or hallucinating. All your photos are blurry. Just because they haven't found one yet doesn't mean they don't exist. New species are being discovered all the time. As for the suit if they can't find it then...

@blackstersherron Just because they haven't found one yet doesn't mean they don't exist. Don't call me dumb. Were you there in 1967? If not then don't comment. Watch the Bill Munn analysis of the film. I'd rather beleive him then somebody with no credentials.

I agree that the suit looks nothing like the creature in the Patterson film. Also Bob Heironimus is not big enough. The creature in the film has been estimated at over 7ft tall.

This could have been filmed anywhere. What proof do you have that it's Bluff Creek?

@therealcrazyfish Yeah and so did other people make that claim.. Also Bob Heironimus's story has changed over the years.

Yeah the guy said the film was fake. Over 30 years later. Why did he wait so long? If he didn't get paid then he should have said something back then. Others who have seen the creature and have had guns said they couldn't shoot it because it was too human like.

What is it you are trying to prove? Answer your own questions. If there guys are hunting bigfoot then why and who are they?

What the hell are you trying to prove? Just come out and say it. I don't get it.

One bloody paw print? That doesn't make any sense. What kind of conclusion are you trying tio make?

Oh wow you found some trees in a forest that look the same. What are the odds of that, and one one looks like it has a mark like a hand print. I guess that proves you right. Were you there? if not then shut up. If it was a costume then somebody come up with it because so far no one has.

Why was the person focusing on the area before the bigfoot showed up.?

I've seen evidence on both sides whether this film is real or not. I'm still not sure either way. I'm open minded to there being such a creature. However my main problem is that this video is over 40 years old. With all the people out there looking and all the modern day equipment , it's still...

I see 2 reasons why she got this job.