MrGralgrathor's channel

@valeredebrabandere

Dus.

@Bailey828282

"hardly any damage"

Holy f*ck... You really are pulling our legs, aren't you? Good one!

@AstirInch

You're wrong on a couple of counts, and hideously confused on most.

1. What on Earth do you mean when you say that bacterial genomes code "just for themselves"? As opposed to what? Should genomes of one organism code for other organisms? Huh?

2. What on Earth do you mean when you sa...

@SpeedyRemake

"ASSUMPTION"

Actually, they were tentative conclusions, based on his observations.

"fossil evidence actually favors creation"

... But it doesn't. The fossil record clearly shows change through time. More specifically, it shows diverging progressions of traits. But even without ...

@greken145

"u just thanked a christian"

No he didn't. He thanked 'evolution' (which is silly in itself; it's like me saying "thank gravity!") and science.

@daolong51279

"I just dont get it."

It used to be excorsism to "drive out demons" out of sick people. These days it's biblical literalism. Religious nuttery is a thing of all times. What's to get?

@chyno37

"I will be the first to kill"

And you think that saying things like that is an argument *for* theistic morality?

All you're demonstrating here is that there are truly *immoral* theists in this world, and that you are a prime example.

@rutofan

"is Evolution really"

Yes, it is.

"from rocks?"

No. And since evolutionary theory 1) does not address life-origins, and 2) no scientific study in any branch claims any lifeform or life in general "came from rocks", we must conclude that you are implictly misrepresenting scientific fi...

@ParaPerception

What other beliefs do you respect, and why? What beliefs do you not respect, or disrespect - and why? No need for a lengthy response, but a few short words would be appreciated.

@daverowbotham

Can't tell whether he was blocked or not, but I can tell from his comment history that he's been *strafing* AE videos with a particular text ("The Atheist Experience team are a bunch of hypocrites..."). If he did that on my channel, I would feel completely justified in blocking him.

@Adeptmind

"my eyes"

That doesn't worry me much. As I said, I'd already concluded you were never going to see reason. But I do feel obligated to help the spread of misinformation - and therefore will respond when I see you making a factually inaccurate statement or unsubstantiated claim.

@pat442389

"revenge against god"

... A model that explains a set of biological observations is "revenge against god"? Well, okay.

"is a theory same as god"

Nah, "goddiddit" is not a theory. A theory is a comprehensive, coherent explanatory model, consisting of facts, laws and testable hypothe...

@marykfilms

"Where are they?"

Many intermediate forms are found among extant species. Most however are extinct, and although we may find thousands of them in the fossil record, most of them will never be known and can only be extrapolated from what little is available to us. What is available t...

@MrNetimpact

You know, scientists are trying to explain stuff we observe in terms of other stuff we observe. For instance: evolution in terms of reproductive variation and differential reproductive success; speciation in terms of genetic divergence and reproductive isolation.

So, in stead of re...

@JBLUVER161505

"the world is destroying traditional marriage"

So? Why should traditional marriage be special?

O, more importantly: how does gay marriage affect the marriage between man and woman?

Are you afraid that people might be thinking something "hm, shall I pick heterosexual marriage ...

@heiningerjohn

"attempt to create a TOE"

Possibly, yes. Or at least a theory of how the universe emerged.

"based on multiple unverifiable "assumptions""

Which is why it's not a theory yet. Until some of those hypotheses can be tested, Krauss' hypothesis is just that: a hypothesis. Nobody is c...

@formerevolutionist

"rationally put the God of the Bible in the same category"

O, they're entirely different kinds of creatures, I'll grant you that. But the argument stays the same, and therefore the analogy stays valid: no evidence, no reason to believe.

@firstplacechickenegg

"like dinosaurs?"

Well, why did anything survive? Sharks and crocodiles survived most likely because they are creatures of the water, and watery habitats were less seriously affected by the catastrophy.

@Liwaymilra

"all great men in history"

And then came modernity, and people learned to examine their basest beliefs in the light of reason.

@clebcal1

"their models demand odds like that"

You're repeating the exact same misconception I corrected you on in my last comment. Are you going to repeat the same mistake again when I'm finished repeating my correction?

Here comes:

Again, no, these odds assume that the whole thing comes to...

@Mcgif21

"My brain is purified"

What'd ya use? Ethanol? Formaldehyde? Or did you mean 'petrified', not 'purified'?

@MADMANx511

"One contradicts the other"

Not necessarily. But the biblical god certainly contradicts any common sense-based view of reality.

@Frank289100

Good-by, troll boy.

@gellendar420

"explained through evolution"

Well, I need to qualify that. Of course evolutionary theory doesn't try to explain all of human morality. But what it can do is explain how certain moral instincts evolved: the basis for snapshot moral decisions that we make.

@updr12

"bold claim"

So, now that I've listed (for the zillionth time) the many independent lines of evidence that independently support common descent - let's have yours. What evidence (independently verifiable observation) goes against common descent?

@StrikaAmaru

"a good definition of "improvement""

It's called a 'fitness landscape'. In engineering, the fitness landscape is determined by the properties of the desired solution. In nature, the fitness landscape is determined by just one thing: reproduction.

"this isn't evolution"

The algori...

@elrynx2

"stop thinking that atheists have "beliefs""

Well, they do. At least I do. I have plenty of beliefs. But a belief in gods is not among them.

@peyupsgurl

"axed because he dared to publish"

1) He was never employed at the journal. He was an unpaid associate.

2) He was never axed. He retained his position until long after the incident.

3) The problem is not that he dared publish: the problem is that he bypassed procedure and peer revie...

@lynnethc

"you are all idiots and wrong"

Well, possibly not idiots, but still wrong. It's very easy to be wrong, you know? Most people are wrong about a great lot of things, often without realizing it. Take the atom, for instance; in the West, everybody learns about the atom as a miniature sola...

@doodoobutter101

It's probably because he's sitting next to Bill. When you're talking to a complete nincompoop yoghurt-brain like O'Reilly, you tend to forget that there are certain standards that people will hold you to.

@greenearthnazi20204u

Put away the bong and go do something useful, kid.

@1991stratplus

"for his scientific knowledge"

Or lack thereof...

@0111LFS

"limits!"

You want something to bitch about, try YouTube's anti-spam algorithms. Somehow, most of my comments get automatically marked as spam. Compared to that, the character limit is a lesser evil.