Mikedogg13666's channel

@tapoplin Is English your first language? I'm asking honestly because placing your statements in all caps and making absolutely Zero sense is not a way to establish credibility. Even if what you are trying to say actually demonstrates a valid or even interesting point, a person needs to understan...

That was WONDERFUL! Hahahaha...I love the mustache kid. It's so Monty Python. Great job!

@KingDavid478 Yea, that's one of the arguments given when a theist knows almost nothing bout the historicity of Christianity in general. I have had people swear up and down that the religion as they currently know it, predates Abraham...I mean come on...it's one thing to not realize that the Cath...

The only thing that I've gotten from this second video is that the narrator is admitting that jesus was just a man and that the same historians who claimed he was a real person having never meeting him in first person were also ones who had no idea of the properties of the physics that demonstrat...

@anantashesha Fair??? What "fair" should I use then huh? The "fair where I just agree with you despite the fact that you haven't even demonstrated how I have become "aggressive." I would suggest that you open your eyes. Theism is the enemy of this entire world. It doesn't matter how many smiles a...

@MoonwalkerWorshiper Ok, to be fair. I will TRY to honor you request. KCA is bs because it pre-assumes a god, period. It ignores the actual multitude of other options for the supposed "beginning" that it assumes and then goes one step further to assume that it is a particular god. I didn't explai...

@robtay1963 Man you are spot on. I wanted, like Matt Dillihunty, to find the 'right" answers, the "right" people who had them and to justify my beliefs. All I found was contortions of stories that no one seemed to have read all the way through. It was so frustrating as an 8 year old child to be f...

@gashyna Two, learning information, processing it, storing it and putting it into action is all we do. Outside of that one can only show that we can, during the processing portion, see repetitive similarities and recognize benefits and non-benefits of that information and act according to what we...

@lastroach The "or" was to imply an equilibrium. It makes the correct assertion that either you learn to comprehend the significance of evidence or the realization that proof is based upon evidence. Whatever strand of linguistic fodder that you cling to...it remains the same. Your incapacity to c...

@JeremiahEnglish Honestly, I have come to the conclusion that people have lost the ability to read a book properly...or perhaps they never really knew how to begin with. I mean take "Agnosticism" for example. It isn't a position that compares to Atheism or Theism. It's a statement about the abili...

@Sk3ptik0n "Then there are those (skeptic) party poopers"... would be the proper way to word your sentence. Proper grammar depicts preparedness. ;-)

Hey, we skeptics dream...we just do it while we're sleeping and can't correct ourselves...right?