@MayonR I have told you what the evidence is: 1. At no time did the population of Canaan exceed 150,000. 2. The Hebrews did not commit a genocide of Canaanites as the bible described. 3. Egypt thrived during the time it was supposedly devasted by the events relating to the Exodus. 4. The desert wasteland could not have supported the millions of escaped slaves. 5. The bible narrative of the Exodus mentions cities that did not exist at the same time. Jericho did not exist when it supposedly fell. I was blocked from the channel, a very common experience when I take the time to make a point on a christian channel. Interesting so many christians have to censor, a sober and honest view of that fact should reveal a lot.

Hey! Thanks for subbing! Favor returned!

@MayonR

Did I say, "METROPOLIS", udumfuk?

I said NEW YORK, and GEORGE BUSH.

George Bush has no historical backing?? New York has no historical or archaeological backing??

Nice attempt at a strawman. I mean really. And waaaaaaaay to miss the _obvious_ point that any work of fiction, can mix real history with FALSE FICTION ON TOP. DUHHH (bible)

You'd have to an imbecile to miss that. Or just deceitful. /facepalm Didn't the bible ever tell you to not lie?

Hello friend,
The lord Jesus Is Lord in every way.
God bless.......Jacqueline

hey MayonR ^_^
I'm glad there is something on there that helps. Praise God! Look to Jesus, He will make a way for His children- He always does. Commit your all to him and most importantly trust.
Blessings to you and your daughter.

Hola :) God Bless you that's all..

Sub to my Channel and I will Sub to yours. Inner strength? Watch the Videos and you will see...

"So that would indicate that anyone who doesn't accept things with evidence are in denial?"

Should say

"So that would indicate that anyone who doesn't accept things without evidence are in denial?"

Those who won't accept things when the evidence is staring them in the face (ie evidence everyone can see and report back the characteristics of the evidence even if they don't like the conclusions) would be someone in denial

"Sounds like denial, lol"

So that would indicate that anyone who doesn't accept things with evidence are in denial? There's just as much evidence for any god as there is for Nessie, Abominable Snowmen, Fairies, Unicorns, etc. As my skepticism leads me to ignore them too, would that be denial on my part?

Again, I invite you to a neutral venue where we can't delete posts or ban the other and everyone can see from start to finish whose argument has merit

Again, unless you fear your holy book really can't be defended under the light of scrutiny

What happened to the comments I posted on your channel?