MajorRick12345's channel

@Aggiesgigem and YET, they still magically end up with some real idiots. Imagine that! There simply is NO excuse. Their position brings with it tremendous responsibility; therefore, there should not be so many 2nd chances. Some of the examples shown here not only should require immediate termi...

@chellumac20 try telling that to the cop when he/she pulls up. that 'pedestrian' had NO PLACE standing in that parking space. The space was open, the driver in the blue car should have pulled out a video and filmed as she 'slowly' eased forward while her passenger has cops on her phone. There...

@Shadowcaster316 here are just a few examples:: constitution. org / uslaw / defunlaw.txt

try that for starters

@DavidForthoffer I must admit, now that I have looked again, you may be correct. The State relies on TCA 4-7-104 that somehow gives Troopers (Dept. of Safety) the authority to stop simply to 'check' license. Hmmm, not really sure anymore as I don't think this has ever been challenged constitu...

@savemyrepublic I actually agree with you 100%. I simply had a problem with him making the stop initially; especially IF you weren't doing anything illegal. I say film, film, film and if they don't like it, change professions. We ALL MUST strive to hold our officials accountable. I'm not sug...

@cincinatus90 just read it and that 'could' get u in hot water in certain situations, but not if if involves public officials performing their duty. "a citizen's right to film government officials, including law enforcement officers, in the discharge of their duties in a public space is a basic, ...

@savemyrepublic You have three years for a personal injury suit. I would go federal with 42 USC 1983. There's a strong chance it would never make it to trial.

@dune5star First, the military is bound by the USMJ, NOT the 4th Amend. No LEO anywhere in the country can use the 'act of filming/taking pics' as suspicious to justify a seizure. 2nd, IF you are filming while on a military installation, that would not be considered 'public domain' so you do NO...

Remember that because public schools are not entirely public forums, school administrators often have the discretion to restrict the entry of outsiders, particularly while the school is in session. "school loitering laws" are mainly aimed at keeping sexual predators and drug dealers away from sch...

@radfordvabeach It's easy to feel that way UNTIL you are on the other end. That young man OBVIOUSLY was committing no crime, he rode off on his bike. It begs the question-WHY was he detained initially. This is NOT about 'not liking cops.' I have great respect for their duty. HOWEVER, when a ...

@reddog2007max Anyone acting that way is truly asking for it. Actually, the cop was rather patient with her. She was on private property causing a huge disturbance, Mgmt obviously called cops, how long should the cop struggle with her. I can't believe they didn't clear the lobby sooner; that c...

@Dougster No worries,,, all of that has been shot down by federal courts. These federal cases are quickly spreading across the country. "a citizen's right to

film government officials, including law enforcement officers, in

the discharge of their duties in a public space is a basic, vital,

and w...

@toptruckracer just a side note for you. IF he ran the serial #, He CLEARLY violated your 4th Amend. Read Arizona v. Hicks. That case was specifically about 'serial numbers' albeit the 'numbers' in question were serial #s of electronic equipment. The same analogy would apply. I may be wrong,...

@jcnme27 Let him live in his ignorance. Our Sheriff and several detectives on the FCSO drive a marquis. In the next county, the detectives drive explorers. They can drive whatever the county/state/city etc wants them to drive. duh. As someone else said,, ex-cop... WOW,, this is the very rea...

@MortifiedPenguin0319 So, you are saying if you are 'innocent,' you must co-operate. I like that word-'co-operate.' Their authority lies in enforcing the laws, period. If you are NOT violating or suspected of violating a law; then it is very clear, they have NO AUTHORITY OVER YOU. What part o...

@o56kid for anyone interested in LEGALLY resisting UNLAWFUL ARREST; go to constitution dot org fwd slash uslaw fwd slash defunlaw dot txt

@rcnoe71 Actually, she (the teacher) was NOT exercising her 'right' as she was, at that particular time was a representative of the gov't. She had a right to 'disagree' w/this student, but could NOT stop her from expressing her political views. Yes, she could make a 'request,' AND this student ...

@djtohkee That my 'dear friend' is exactly why we are in the state we're in. "follow directions???' Are u kidding. Let me first say I am, in no way, anti-police; however, I have seen extremely too many LEOs clearly abusing their alleged authority--because somebody didn't 'follow directions.' S...

@Sofiuh not trying to 'bash' you BUT, so many ppl are putting out misinformation about the taser. IT MALFUNCTIONED. That is how he just pulled the darts out of his neck. Bottomline::: that was an over-kill. Deadly Force is suppose to be the LAST Resort. Ofc had many other options. Additiona...

Many of the comments here show the truly SAD STATE our country come to. So many comments stating 'he deserved it,' 'he's "crazy", cops should kill em'. Did anyone think that he may have had a mental issue. All these comments without knowing any real facts relevant to "why" he was where he was....

@SemperBeer First,, YES,, the cop was extremely polite; however, he can not arrest the guy for being in his underwear unless he was 'exposed'. ladies can wear bikinis, which in some cases, show much more than 'underwear.' The 'intoxication' may be another story. the 2 girls gave him NO reasona...

@arachnofreak76 You should b given a badge... I questioned the reason for LEO taking pic. U guessed it perfectly. They could (& probably would) try to falsely charge this guy even tho a pic would not come close to 'beyond a reasonable doubt.'- And why? Because they can. My friend, that IS the ...

For all of you NAZI supporters on here that somehow are able to try to justify any of this brutality, take a look at the news followup on youtube-- Humphreys deputies placed on administrative leave--.. Darin Ring may be a lowlife scum; BUT can you really, with any humanity, try to suggest these "...

@Uneducated81 Your 'name' fits perfectly. IF... they were concerned about guns or safety, simply pat them down to verify no weapons. It IS Jan. 34 ,, 8:45pm.,, I'd say it was rather cold. INsanity and absolute abuse of power. i.e. laughing while they beat him. Additionally, it is NOT illegal ...

@MajorRick12345 forward slash defunlaw dot txt

@macoflaf2 Are you an idiot or just seriously confused. LEO are public officials, therefore the name & badge # is PUBLIC info. No one puts out anything more. This video doesn't even suggest he "don't like the law." In fact, he, the videographer, was actually upholding the law by informing the...

@spr2002 the site is soverign-citizenship dot net

@shawnbrennan1 had to add this after reading the long description above. Just as I expected. She was only a passenger and suspected of nothing. She has no legal duty to provide any info to any LEO. No where in the description do they even come close to suggesting she committed any crime: only...

Listen very carefully at mark: 5:33. The LEO even calls this guy the "victim." That was clearly a subconscious slip. In his own mind, he believes buehler is the victim. Of all people for the cop to harass and assault, he had to pick a West Point Grad. This couldn't be any funnier. We all MU...

@concernedcitizen05 You should change your name to 'concerned sheep.' Educate yourself. I will not say ALL LEO are (*&)(&; but this is clearly a tactical maneuver. They have already refused to release the tape & convinced the AG to back them. Would you answer why??? The same reason many fed L...

@Fred420ist she very clearly admits they are seizing the money EVEN THOUGH these ppl have not committed a crime. Doesn't matter what they use the money for, they are stealing it for their own use;; KNOWINGLY. Isn't that money laundering also. Additionally, why were they detained initially??? H...

@Liquid1Creator Not so. IF one 'conceals' merch. under the shirt or in the pants, they can be arrested for shoplifting. I have worked in many states (TN was one of them) and many convictions for shoplifting even tho they never left the store. This, however, is extremely over the top. Basicall...

@GREWUPINEIGHTIES not exactly true.. depends on the state. In many states, if you 'conceal' merch. you can be arrested/convicted for shoplifting. passing the exit or last 'payment center' is NOT the threshold anymore. I had many ppl convicted for 'concealing' it on their person. Over 20 yrs d...

@falcon21386 The guy may lose his criminal case (if there is on) but he could still file a 1983 suit and possibly win for excessive force. The pepper spray was quite unnecessary as he was already cuffed and detained and was NOT fighting. I would take the case without hesitation