Jesrael1986M's channel

@timchilli Translation : "The evidence presented in this video is so threatening to my world view that I have no choice but to hurl insult and ridicule to try and alleviate my cognitive dissonance."

@brharrii Theist or atheist, we can all agree that Dawkins' arguments are embarrassing.

Dear Prof. Dawkins, why don't you debate William Lane Craig ?

Dawkins: "The why question is just a silly question!"

I agree with Dawkins. If you don't believe that Jesus is the Son of God, you are not a Christian in any meaningful sense of the term. You are of course, free to "self-identify" as a Christian, but then you completely take out any meaning from that word.

@jaxl2009 Indeed. They both are examples of contempt for the sanctity and dignity of human life.

@ClamCrunchy You are absolutely right! Nobody claims that mass extinctions are due to design. Nobody claims that Junk DNA is due to design. ID is no the claim that everything is designed. ID is simply an attempt to look at objects and events on a case-by-case basis and identify some things which ...

@mancno1 "William Lane Craig is one the leading philosophers of religion and one of the leading philosophers of time" .... "a count of the articles in the philosophy journals shows that more articles have been published about Craig's defense of the Kalam argument than have been published about an...

@emailpobox666 Also, in quantum mechanics, the act of observation causes a collapse of a wave-function, and if two particles are entangled, observing one will collapse the wave-function of the other. Now the funny thing is, if the two events are separated by a large-enough space, it becomes meani...

@lxAgnosticxl Here's the timeline:

30 AD Crucifixion (Pilate was procurator from 26-36, and Passover falls on Friday only on 30 and 33, so it's got to be one of the two, probably 30).

32 AD Paul's conversion - you get this date from comparing Acts, Galatians and secular records.

3 years later...

@MrLittletomdj Why not? Is there any evidence that the designer of the universe is NOT the God of the Bible? Design arguments give us part of a cumulative case for theism. But of course they don't prove Christianity. That's why God has given us the Scriptures.

@infinity730 When I see atheists try to take the "moral" high ground, I know they have lost the intellectual battle. It's funny to see you behaving like a a fundamentalist preacher, throwing Bible verses around. As for name calling, Jesus was also 'guilty' of doing it - "brood of vipers", "whitew...

@impiccolomofo Actually he liked Neville's speech, he found it very funny.

@Andy32268 I believe in God because He has revealed Himself through His creation, through the moral law that He has written in our hearts, and through His self revelation through the prophets and especially through Christ. The Holy Spirit is the one who convicts us of the truth of these things.

...

@ETHANGELIST If it is God's will that WLC be Molinist (for His greater glory), who are you O Calvinist to talk back to God?

@mrquinnie429 There is only one entity in the universe that is capable of contemplating it's significance, and that is the species of which you are a member. That's our greatness. The universe is nothing in comparison.

@AgeOfReasonXXI Thank you for your rational comment and the clarity you bring to the discourse, AgeOfReason. What a reasonable person you are. Such pure, unadulterated Reason, it's amazing!

@Jesrael1986M But they were not so silly as to think that everything popped into existence out of nothing for no reason. Dawkins believes that.

The title is misleading. Marian didn't break Guy's heart. In this episode it becomes clear that he doesn't love her. She told him that she would willingly marry him if he killed the Sheriff and saved the King. Instead he decides to go with the Sheriff and plans to FORCE her to marry him later.

@hobaleo How else do you explain the fact that he writes a 500 page bestseller directly challenging creationism and intelligent design, yet he's too scared to face the most prominent ID supporters? I'm sure Behe, Dembski and Meyer would welcome a debate with Dawkins.

@nymphrenic It's interesting to see how Paul recognizes Peter's primacy in Galatians 2:11.

@stuyboi888 God is not real ? You might as well tell me that the Sun does not shine or that water is not wet. That's how silly it sounds.

@Downshifting07 I'm not following your argument. How does the conclusion "God does not exist" follow from the premises?

@CultoftheAmateur Oh no, not at all. I accept the resurrection because it is strongly supported by the historical evidence. As for Pythogoras and Apollonius, I haven't studied the evidence, but I'm very much open to the supernatural in other religions. Still, I'll be a Christian until I can find ...

@johnnyp76 You are right that there are all these possibilities. But do any of these allow for a causal chain from the propositional content of belief to physiological behavior? To return to the frog example. Why should natural selection care about the frog's beliefs? If you design a robot to cat...

There's something about premise 1 that's fishy. Put it this way:

1. It is possible that there exists a maximally great being (MGB).

2. Definition: MGB = a maximally excellent being (MEB) in all possible worlds.

3. Definition : Its is possible that X = there exists a possible world in which X

...

@mjt532 Yes there are lot of possibilities. But I would rather go with the evidence - what the 1st century sources actually say.

When Intelligent Design wins the day in biology, atheists will be ashamed that they ever believed in the creative power of "natural selection".

@colossus999 Of course. He only debates intellectual heavyweights like Ted Haggard