**************************
Conflicting Denominations

The unity of the Church is not made tru names or doctrines, but by Christ, I consider that there are a LOT of denominations with WRONG doctrines but, brothers often have disagreements and -once born- they can never deny their bond, in the same way, our brotherhood is complete when we are truly sons of God seeking for Christ, nevertheless, I will not hesitate in pointing out doctrines created by men, mostly because they work against thge salvation of the lost ones.

**************************
The stupidity of atheism

Atheism is utterly stupid, but is also a problem in some hearts, atheists are people that God loves as He loves you and me, but, their ideology should be attacked with our spiritual weapons for the moral restauration of mankind and the salvation of many.

Nano-rants:

Once I went to a show, there was a table and an empty hat, then, a rabbit popped into being out of nowhere, nobody was amazed, they were atheists.

BTW, unless you are a Christian, you can be an anti-atheist: cuz evolved monkeys have no way to tell it is wrong ;)

Multiverse: atheist just hate our finely tuned universe :)

Did you noticed the bias? You are allowed to believe in parallel universes but never in timeless realms.

But if you think about it, you HAVE to laugh at their multiverse, cuz atheists now must believe in unicorns, leprechauns, random brains, powerful minds, etc

Pre-cambrian transitionals: cuz atheists have more faith than you and I together.

Cambrian rabbits? don't need them, we have precambrian pollen in Venezuela

Evolution: with faith you can believe ANYTHING, from positive copy errors to randomly created DNA/RNA reading and translating machinery.

Lack of belief: genocidal atheists murdered millions because they lacked a belief in God/gods, they actually hated the believers, do you know some of that kind?

Lack-a-belief is a non-position, is worst that agnosticism, we don't want a non-position, we want truth, we want evidence to follow it where it leads.

Historical lessons: I know that most atheists aren't dangerous but the risk of having a brutal antitheistic dictator is something that should be reduced to zero.

"The why question is a silly question" -Richard Donkeyz (an embarassment for atheism)

S. Hawking: by 1963 I was told I only had 2 years before I die... am I evidence for a miracle?

Atheism vs Atheism: they totally self refute! with no objective morality, with no solid grounds, with no objective belief, they totally fall under a tiny dosis of post modernism which they can't reject.


******************************
The heavens declare the Glory of God

Exoplanets: totally destroyed the nebula theory or the natural atempt to remove God from planets creation.

Stars: The compression of gas and dust is impossible since gravity is such a weak force relative to gas pressure as given by Boyle's law

Solar flares: Our sun is uniquely calmed and special for us :)


Bloqueado por:
kbayero40: le dije que era un hipócrita por llorar sobre la discriminación de los ateos y al mismo tiempo criticar al cristianismo

you know, if you are hated by the world, you are doing a good job in apologetics

I'm a biblical Christian, skeptical in any topic specially in doctrinal issues just like Paul said: test everything, hold on to the good. Because our rationality is given by God and therefore, common sense humble interpretation is good, never twisting the main doctrines in the Bible (those repeated over and over again).

==================
GENESIS INTERPRETATION

It seems patently obvious that the Genesis account refers to a short period of creation, but it is so short and undetailed (in respect to the rest of the history) that it has allowed some ppl to wonder if it refers to an abreviated account of a long age creation, in the matters of belief, I hold the intuitive interpretattion and respect others as well.
However, when engaging in a dialectic process about the factuality of past events, I will hold a more agnostic position relying only in observational data (neutral grounds), in doing this, my scope is short in making conclusions about the past but several lines of data allow us to discard naturalistic origins for mankind and similar creatures.
In the broader sense, I'm a creationist like every Christian, I hold belief in the intentional creation of our finely tuned universe and the intelligent design of living things, the question that I consider valid among believers is: how did it exactly happened?

==================
ABOUT COSMOLOGY

Were we creationists dishonest, we would have proposed a cosmological model with a recent inflationary period, a dark clumpy ether deaccelerating photons and dark energy to fill in the gaps.

Nevertheless, fudge-factors are a non-explanations, I don't buy the big bang pseudoscience, here it's why:

==================
COSMOLOGY DOGMA

Redshift was the observation and space expansion was the non-sequitor, ockham's razor would humbly say that -most- galaxies are moving away from us.

Dark matter: was the erroneous conclussion of accelerated galaxies in clusters, was the ad hoc solution for the formation of galaxies, clusters, superclusters and filaments under the extremely weak gravitational force.

Dark energy: also an ad hoc creation, the real observation was an elevated redshift for -apparently- closer galaxies, then, it was mathematically finely tuned (at 1 part in 10^120) in order to make it fit the dogmatic age of the universe of 13,7BY

CMBR is a misnomer, and it wasn't an exclusive prediction of the big bang but also of the stationary model, black body physics, particle models and electric models, which made a much more accurate prediction of 2ºK to 3ºK

Inflation: was the ad hoc solution to the uniformity of the CMBR and affects the calculation of the age of the universe

Dark matter, dark energy, and inflation theoretically alter the expansion rate of the universe, therefore, they alter the stimates for the age of the universe, however, since the '13BY ago' is a dogma, dark matter and energy's properties have to be finely-tunned in order to fit that dogma, and then they are used back to "prove" the age of the universe. It's all fudge-factors for a flawed expansionary hypothesis sustained by circular calculations, peer pressure and the fallacy of assertion.

Dark flow and dark force are more fudge-factor in the flawed big bang cosmology.

========
MY VIEW:

An Electric Universe based on observations, and we should seriously consider observations instead of evolutionary story-telling.

Dark entities are just EM fields which btw are invisible, some dark stuff are simply plasma in dark mode and cold dust, just like the huge bubbles recently detected sandwiching the milky way.

Those EM fields are known to exist as monopolar motors in the center of the milky way or supernovas.

==================
RELIGIOUS ADD-ONS:

An static model is unviable. The Bible is clear in that God 'stretcheth' the heavens like a veil.
And the evidence fits, in the sense that most galaxies appear to be receeding from us in a proportional manner, like a veil. A recent inflationary period reamins as a posibility.
It's not certain if the expansion stopped or is continuing today, and even if it stopped, that effect may not be detectable to us. the Biblical clue is that the heavens will pass away before the coming of the LORD, suggesting that the expansion will go on at increased rates.