† Jᴇsᴜs ɪs ᴛʜᴇ ᴏɴʟʏ ᴡᴀʏ †
HushAndLearn's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Life Hard Questions by Ravi Zacharias Lecture
 
 
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
HushAndLearn
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Name:
Juan Fernando
Channel Views:
44,330
Total Upload Views:
342,175
Age:
34
Joined:
Oct 7, 2007
Latest Activity:
6 days ago
Subscribers:
3,347
[John 14:6] Jesus said: I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
About Me:
 
First and foremost I am a Christian person with a passionate love for the person and teachings of Jesus Christ (Lord).

Theology and apologetics is part of my hobbies and I'll be glad to respond any questions in help you to get in faith with Jesus Christ as always using logical and reasonable answers.

I studied Electrical Eng and Computer systems. Lastly working on special graphic 2D and 3D effects and an illusionist as a hobby overall.

I've been debating so many evolutionists (With Master and PhD. degree) and I am REALLY astonished how even evolutionists contradict themselves over and over. Not only had they never won over Creation but instead I been correcting evolutionists over and over using only facts and not ideas. And they all end up trying to disprove religion, creation or God.

I used to believe in macro-evolution but after I understood it I definitely deny it. Most of evolutionists' arguments are REALLY old school arguments and most of the time their arguments had anything to do against creation or God.

Macro-evolution is a coward strategy hiding behind the facts of Micro-evolution to justify Macro, which is a shameful and a coward strategy to deceive fools.

After while, this really is waste of time talking over and over of same things with many different evolutionists believing they have new and better concepts, just because someone give you an explanation of the facts the explanation itself doesn't become a fact.

When there're many explanations for facts and someone keep only one to make it fit into their religion call evolution then that is call ignorance by denying all possible explanations.
-HushAndLearn

God bless.

─╔═╗─If You Are
╔╝─╚╗A Christian
╚╗─╔╝Then
─║─║─Copy this &
─╚═╝─Put it on your page

---[]--- put this
---[]--- on your
---[]--- youtube page
[][][][][] if your
---[]--- not embarrassed
---[]--- to tell
---[]--- others that
---[]--- your a
---[]--- Christian

--------††††---------Please
--------††††---------Place
--------††††---------This
†††††††††††††-Cross
†††††††††††††-On
--------††††---------Your
--------††††---------Channel
--------††††---------To Show
--------††††---------That You
--------††††---------Love & Believe
--------††††---------In God and Jesus Christ.
Channel Comments
NewRoofSanDiego (1 day ago)
Your are welcome
MacThugTupac (1 week ago)
Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
MacThugTupac (1 week ago)
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.
HushAndLearn (1 week ago)
@LogicalThinker667 -Actually is quite opposite, many families with or without substance are heaving families in a very conscious or unconscious ways. The creation model that he used was extremely little compare to actual growth rate. And all in all, the creation model was the best to fit even for the fossils we have regardless the present population.

Regards.
LogicalThinker667 (1 week ago)
Woah, sorry I didn't see your reply...
Anyways the creation model doesn't take into account periods of little to no growth or when the logistic carrying capacity is reached and their is no net change in population due to birthrates equaling death rates and resources or technology not allowing for any further growth in population. When the carrying capacity was reached and no more people could be supported then their was a decline in population then a rise again and decline and so on.
Also something you'd learn in a stats class, you can't extrapolate very far without losing accuracy,
HushAndLearn (2 weeks ago)
@LogicalThinker667 -By far, the creation model is the best to fit present world population by any give model. That video is just given an average of 2.5 kids per family regardless if the growth is linear or not, evolutionary model just doesn't fit world population by no mean whatsoever.

Regards.
LogicalThinker667 (2 weeks ago)
*biologist
LogicalThinker667 (2 weeks ago)
Given your video on population it's clear that creationist have never heard of logistic growth curve and logistic carrying capacity and population model. This surprises me as it says in your info bar that you studied as an engineer. Any biology or Environmental science course (AP in high school or one in college) goes over this
Just FYI I'm not an evolutionist, if by that you mean evolutionary biology, I study physics but I remember logistics growth model from my Environmental science class.
xXxThecompaqxXx (2 weeks ago)
HushAndLearn <3
princessliz15 (2 weeks ago)
^_^
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more