@thisnamealsotaken You're wrong here. Not only results that count, but also how they achieve it. Nadal has been injured way too much to be considered the best, i don't know how many times, FO09,knee,Wimb09,knee, USO 09, abs, AO 10, knee, etc. That's pretty ridiculous. From my perspective, if you ...
Hadn't Nadal been there, from 2003 to 2009: Federer would have had 5 consecutives French Open, 7 consecutives Wimbledon and 5 consecutives Us Open, what a scary record if you think about it
Wimb SF 03, Wimb F 04-05-09, USO F 06, USO QF 07, AO SF 07-09, all lost to Federer. Hadn't it been because of Federer, this guy would probably have about 8 GS, not to mention he has reached at least 1 QF of a GS since 2001, this guy is amazing, give him a break.
@thisnamealsotaken You're wrong here. Not only results that count, but also how they achieve it. Nadal has been injured way too much to be considered the best, i don't know how many times, FO09,knee,Wimb09,knee, USO 09, abs, AO 10, knee, etc. That's pretty ridiculous. From my perspective, if you ...