GoaHead80 sin kanal

Få se beviser på at det sprøytes ut chemtrails. Og da snakket jeg ikke om en film på youtube som viser contrails, men ordentlige beviser.

O'Reilly feels he won the "debate" against Dawkins? That's too funny!

Now Kirk: He concludes that the cameralens is designed because of it's complexity. But why does he assume that? What does he compare it to? Does complexity equal design? Does he have an example of something not being designed?

@pnzu My point exactly. This is all you can come up with?

Wow, this really sucks ass.

@heiningerjohn Are you serious? It's verified by fossils and also in dna. If you think it's just a belief, you obviously don't have a clue about the evidence that exists.

Brainwashed by atheistic evolution? Evolution is based on evidence. Also: Nothing creating everything has nothing to do with the evolution theory, evolution teaches how life developed. The fossil record DOES show transitions, but it's not like one creature suddenly turned into another. And if Kir...

If there are mountains of evidence, where are they?

Atheism is not a faith. We don't BELIEVE there is no god. We DON'T believe there IS a god. That's what you're misunderstanding, and the reason your challenge is pointless.

@jojom0411 The mormon religion is a hoax. First of all there are NO historical evidence. They also have "the mark of cain", which is a curse turning peoples skin black. In other words racist.

Lee Strobel is not a scientist. Yet he obviously feels that he can interpret science better than scientists.

THis proves that religion makes people stupid. Biology suggests that evolution is right.

Craig is a wordsmith, who talks his way out of situations without really having a good point. The reason god needs an explanation is because just saying that god created everything is not a good explanation in it self. Not having an explanation for every explantion is something I can agree with, ...

Lee Strobel claims to have been an atheist. But reading his book "The case for Christ", he obviously was not. He only interviews christian scientist, an is never critical to what they tell him.

Is he stupid? Of course you won't have every transition in the fossil record. that would require that every creature that have ever existed must have been fossilized. That's a ridiculous assumption.

@machinedean100 In that case you're using the christian definition of an atheist.

I'm not agnostic. An agnostic views the truth value of religious claims to be unknowable.

If he was truly an atheist, and critically went through the materiel, how come he accepts everything at once? He never question what he's told. I'm reading he's book right now, because my religous brother in law gave it to us. He asks questions and get answers that he should look more into. But h...

@manonthetoilet All fossil records do. If they didn't then it would have disproven it. But this far the predictions are right. Abiogenesis is not a part of evolution.

If a creator created as many species as there are records of and 99% are extinct in under 10000 years, then this is a horrible creator indeed.

Interpreting the bible is not science. It's rubbish.

@Falcondick69 First of all it's not a belief. Scientists make the observations and predictions. You can't expect everyone who trusts the scientific method and have a basic understanding of science to know every detail in every aspect of science. I can defend my view, but looking at a scientific a...