ForeignPolicyJournal

ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

10:00 Add to

WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

7,557 views

ForeignPolicyJournal said:

@AlienEntity1 I wish to discuss with you. Again, why don't you and I take this to a proper forum, as YouTube comments section is not accommodating for this kind of debate.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 We're discussing WTC 7, not 1 and 2. Free fall acceleration means all the building's potential energy was converted to kinetic energy. So, tell me, where did the energy come from to remove the columns from the equation?

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 You are wrong. Movement of the roofline began many frames prior to NIST's start time. Anyone with a decent video editing program can verify that, so there's no sense pretending.

  It isn't necessary to precisely quantify the pull-in. It's enough to recognize that pull-in occurred, an...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 Just because you don't understand the laws of physics doesn't mean they don't apply in this universe.

  Look, shall we go on with the meaningless empty rhetoric, or discuss the facts? Again, please acknowledge:

  1) Energy may be converted from one form to another, but never created o...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 What bypassess all the engineering problems, as well as the laws of physics, is the fire-induced collapse hypothesis. LOL!

+ View allshow less

ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

10:00 Add to

WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

7,557 views

ForeignPolicyJournal said:

@AlienEntity1 No, Chandler was not incorrect. He is correct. NIST is incorrect about "Stage 1" of the collapse, which doesn't exist, for reasons I've already stated ad nauseum.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 No, you haven't "corroborated" the NIST timing. Anyone with a decent video editing software program can check and see for themselves that movement of the roofline began PRIOR to NIST's chosen start time, making it completely arbitrary, but for the fact that it just so happens to coi...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 First, again, there is no empirical evidence of columns buckling. If you disagree, you are welcome to present this alleged evidence.

  Second, once again, there was no "Stage 1" of collapse. NIST engaged in scientific fraud, choosing an otherwise arbitrary start time for global colla...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 It is relevant to the physics. The discovery of nano-thermite in the dust offers an explanation for how free-fall acceleration could be achieved -- something the fire-induced collapse hypothesis does not offer. It is not possible for fire to cause all load-bearing columns of the per...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 What would you like me to prove, exactly? That for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction? That energy can be converted from one form or another, but never created or destroyed?

  Shall we discuss the problems with the NIST report and hypothesis it presents? Also, I wou...

+ View allshow less

ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

10:00 Add to

WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

7,557 views

ForeignPolicyJournal said:

@AlienEntity1 Appeal to authority fallacy. Sorry you can't be helped by reason. Kind of sad.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 Ah, we agree on something finally: Yes, the building imploded, which, yes, is empirical evidence for the collapse.

  You have eyes, yet refuse to see. Oh well....

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 1) What is not an intelligent or sincere rebuttal is to deny the laws of physics. 2) The core aside, I speak with reference to the perimeter columns; again, there is no empirical evidence of buckling columns, and again, you have measurable free-fall acceleration.

  But of course you'...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 "Tactics"? The fire-induced collapse hypothesis violates the laws of physics. This hypothesis requires that columns were buckling. Yet it is observably not true that columns were buckling. Not only is there no empirical evidence for that, but you have measured and acknowledged free-...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 LOL! No, I show no respect for "qualified analysis" (if that's what you want to call it) that violates elementary laws of physics you learned in high school. Now, if you want to argue the laws of physics were suspended on 9/11, that's another argument. But if you accept that they we...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 Good Lord, man. Free-fall acceleration. This is high school physics. How can you not comprehend that free-fall acceleration ipso facto means no resistance? That is perfectly elementary. Newton's third law of motion. Also elementary physics: free-fall means all of the building's pote...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 "Negligible" means "so small or unimportant or of so little consequence as to warrant little or no attention", actually. Like I said, NIST can't undo the laws of physics with an adjective. Buckling columns offer resistance.

+ View allshow less

ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

10:00 Add to

WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

7,557 views

ForeignPolicyJournal said:

@AlienEntity1 The fact that I'm not a structural engineer is irrelevant, and I needn't repeat yet again why the fire-induced collapse hypothesis violates the laws of physics (specifically, the law of conservation of energy and Newton's 3rd law of motion). I've been over it ad nauseum.

It's curio...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 I know a few elementary laws of physics that you lean in high school. Like the law of conservation of energy and Newton's third law of motion. This is not rocket science. The fire-induced collapse hypothesis violates the laws of physics. Period.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 It's nice to see you acknowledge that your previous assertion that buckling columns offer no resistance is false. As for your adjective "negligible", which you parrot from NIST, that is meaningless. You can't undo the laws of physics with an adjective. Had the columns been buckling,...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 9 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 Wait. You're giving me lecture on respecting science and they arguing that buckling columns offer no resistance, all in the same breath? That pretty much epitomizes your whole argument.

  So long as there is buckling, there is resistance. Newton's third law of motion.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 11 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 As I already pointed out to you, you are wrong. According to NIST, column buckling continued through Stage 2 of the collapse (free-fall). I've already quoted and provided you the reference.

  Talk about wilfull ignorance! Hypocrite!

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 11 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 There is very sound physics that it is impossible. It's called the law of conservation of energy. Your position is based on a rejection of the laws of physics. Buckling columns takes work, which requires energy. Free fall means there was no energy remaining to do that work, which me...

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 11 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1, you're arguing a point I've already long and repeatedly acknowledged. Yes, there is a margin of error in the calculation of the acceleration of the building. It's not that significant, and the point remains the same. To the resolution of the video, acceleration indistinguishable of...

+ View allshow less

ForeignPolicyJournal commented 11 months ago

10:00 Add to

WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

7,557 views

ForeignPolicyJournal said:

@AlienEntity1 NIST's discussion of the collapse times are given in section 12.5.3, pages 600-604. No margin of error is provided in their calculations of collapse time. But that's neither here nor there. It's rather a moot point.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 11 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 Please cite what page of NCSTAR 1-9 you are referring to. Thanks.

• ForeignPolicyJournal commented 11 months ago

  10:00 Add to

  WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

  This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.

  Note that comments are allowed on this vi...

  7,557 views

  ForeignPolicyJournal said:

  @AlienEntity1 You're splitting hairs. Look, I'll give you several hundreths of a second, or even several tenths of a second as a margin of error.

  The point remains just the same.

+ View allshow less