|
DraglifeSF liked a video
(1 month ago)
Kenya Michaels from Ru Paul's Drag Race Season 4 gives Tori some makeup ...
more
Kenya Michaels from Ru Paul's Drag Race Season 4 gives Tori some makeup tips for her shoot with the acclaimed San Francisco photographer Jose A Guzman Colon, then all head to San Jose for Pollo Del Mar's The Glamazone at Renegades bar featuring Kenya Michaels!
less
|
|
| |
|
|
DraglifeSF uploaded a new video
(1 month ago)
Kenya Michaels from Ru Paul's Drag Race Season 4 gives Tori some makeup ...
more
Kenya Michaels from Ru Paul's Drag Race Season 4 gives Tori some makeup tips for her shoot with the acclaimed San Francisco photographer Jose A Guzman Colon, then all head to San Jose for Pollo Del Mar's The Glamazone at Renegades bar featuring Kenya Michaels!
less
|
|
| |
|
|
promotional video for the glamaZONE. made for my good friend pollo del m...
more
promotional video for the glamaZONE. made for my good friend pollo del mar!!!!
less
|
|
| |
|
|
DraglifeSF uploaded a new video
(2 months ago)
Tori and Anya get ready for Tori's show WERQ! at Deco Lounge in San Fran...
more
Tori and Anya get ready for Tori's show WERQ! at Deco Lounge in San Francisco, California, with RAJA from Rupaul's Drag Race Season 3, Mahlae Balenciaga, and Holotta Tymes.
Special thanks to Raja, and Deco Lounge; Alejandro and The Drag Queen Posse (www.thedragqueenposse.com) for footage of WERQ!
Music is copyright of the respective holder, and is not intended as infringement.
Use of performance music in this video falls under 17 U.S.C. § 107 for FAIR USE under PARODY & SATIRE clauses.
Creative commons royalty free music used in this episode:
www.newgrounds.com
"Impulse(Aero)" by Aeromusic
"Faxing Berlin" by DJ DELA
"housepreview" by Alexjav21
"beach" by Ben(BuggMusic)
Id. at 581: Even satire that does not target the original work can be considered fair use if, for instance, there is little possibility that consumers would view the satire as a commercial substitute.
Courts should not pass judgment on the literary meaning and aesthetics of
a work: noted in Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239, 251 (1903):
The Supreme Court has unequivocally held that a parody may qualify as fair use
under § 107. According to the Court, a parody is the "use of some elements of a
prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in part, comments on
that author's works." Id. at 580. Like other forms of comment or criticism,
parody can provide social benefit, "by shedding light on an earlier work, and, in
the process, creating a new one." Id. In other words, parodies can be considered
"transformative" works, as opposed to merely "superseding" works. Since
transformative works "lie at the heart of the fair use doctrine's guarantee of
breathing space within the confines of copyright," the more transformative the
parody, the less will be the importance of other § 107 factors that may weigh
against a finding of fair use. Id. at 579.
15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(4)(B): Following First Amendment precedent, expressive works may be
considered "noncommercial" even though they have a commercial
purpose. "Thus, for example, the use of famous marks in non-commercial
settings, such as parodies, consumer product reviews, and news and
investigative reports, would not be actionable." 2 GILSON ET AL., supra, §
5A.01[9][b]. Parodies, consumer product reviews, and news reports all
arguably contain a commercial component, but can still be considered
"noncommercial speech." The legislative history to the Act's counterpart
16 bill includes a comment from then-chairman of the Senate Judiciary
Committee Orrin Hatch, who remarked, "[t]he bill will not prohibit or
threaten noncommercial expression, such as parody, satire, editorial and
other forms of expression that are not a part of a commercial transaction."
See id. (quoting 141 CONG. REC. S19306, 19310 (daily ed. Dec. 29, 1995)
(statement of Sen. Hatch)).
less
|
|
| |
|
|
DraglifeSF liked a video
(5 months ago)
Anya performs with Nina Flowers at D'Lysh drag show at DECO Lounge. Tor...
more
Anya performs with Nina Flowers at D'Lysh drag show at DECO Lounge. Tori and Mahlae hit the Castro after the show.
Special thanks to Nina Flowers and DECO Lounge, Paul Martinez, Joshua Morency, and Junipera Minono for filming.
Music is copyright of the respective holder, and is not intended as infringement.
Use of performance music in this video falls under 17 U.S.C. § 107 for FAIR USE under PARODY & SATIRE clauses.
Creative commons royalty free music used in this episode:
www.newgrounds.com
"Samurai Duel" by DesoFreelance Records
"Drum and Bass Wip" by Ryan Mitchel (DjCryogenetic)
www.danosongs.com
"Beautiful Straight Lines"
"Snapsphere"
Id. at 581: Even satire that does not target the original work can be considered fair use if, for instance, there is little possibility that consumers would view the satire as a commercial substitute.
Courts should not pass judgment on the literary meaning and aesthetics of
a work: noted in Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239, 251 (1903):
The Supreme Court has unequivocally held that a parody may qualify as fair use
under § 107. According to the Court, a parody is the "use of some elements of a
prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in part, comments on
that author's works." Id. at 580. Like other forms of comment or criticism,
parody can provide social benefit, "by shedding light on an earlier work, and, in
the process, creating a new one." Id. In other words, parodies can be considered
"transformative" works, as opposed to merely "superseding" works. Since
transformative works "lie at the heart of the fair use doctrine's guarantee of
breathing space within the confines of copyright," the more transformative the
parody, the less will be the importance of other § 107 factors that may weigh
against a finding of fair use. Id. at 579.
15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(4)(B): Following First Amendment precedent, expressive works may be
considered "noncommercial" even though they have a commercial
purpose. "Thus, for example, the use of famous marks in non-commercial
settings, such as parodies, consumer product reviews, and news and
investigative reports, would not be actionable." 2 GILSON ET AL., supra, §
5A.01[9][b]. Parodies, consumer product reviews, and news reports all
arguably contain a commercial component, but can still be considered
"noncommercial speech." The legislative history to the Act's counterpart
16 bill includes a comment from then-chairman of the Senate Judiciary
Committee Orrin Hatch, who remarked, "[t]he bill will not prohibit or
threaten noncommercial expression, such as parody, satire, editorial and
other forms of expression that are not a part of a commercial transaction."
See id. (quoting 141 CONG. REC. S19306, 19310 (daily ed. Dec. 29, 1995)
(statement of Sen. Hatch)).
less
|
|
If your into high quality comedy, check out my channel and subscribe if you enjoy!
Message us sometime at: TheDragQueenPosse@gmail.com
Cheers!