Subscription preferences


Loading icon Loading...



Richard Gage QUESTIONED by Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez at AE911Truth Event on 4/12/2011

9,070 views 1 year ago
Listen to Richard Gage admit that he, an architect, has never studied the very important NYC seismographic data, and that thermite does not explain all of the evidence from 9/11 It's absolutely mind-blowing to think about how many well-intended people are still fooled by this man's unscientific claims...

After I found out that Richard Gage was coming to Peoria, IL, I couldn't resist the opportunity to ask him why he continually ignores the overwhelming sum of easily verifiable physical evidence that thermite and explosives of any kind do not explain, why he has not filed his "smoking gun" thermite evidence in a court of law, and why he banned me, a donating member, from his AE911Truth organization just for sending Mr. Gage one well-intended email to ask if he knew about the large sum of important physical evidence that Dr. Judy Wood has discovered. I also asked Mr. Gage some other important questions, such as why he doesn't ever mention Dr. Steven Jones' past work with Los Alamos National Laboratories (the laboratory that conducted the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb and many other top-secret defense / weapons programs), and Dr. Jones's role in disrupting the 'Cold' Fusion research and patent application of Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann long ago. Please pay close attention to Mr. Gage's words, body language, and attitude, and decide for yourself what his intentions are.

In Spring of 2010, I messaged Richard Gage of AE911Truth to ask him if he knew about the large sum of important physical evidence that Dr. Judy Wood has discovered, and as a result, I was silently banned from AE911Truth, despite the fact that I have donated over $100 dollars to Richard Gage and his organization over the course of my one year membership. As of the morning of March 4th 2010, my name was removed from the AE911Truth petition and my profile was deleted, so it appears that I have been banned from the group simply for sharing evidence with Richard Gage in one private email. This is very concerning to me, because I have not done anything wrong by asking Richard Gage if he is aware of the large sum of empirical evidence Dr. Judy Wood has gathered, yet AE911Truth has banned me simply for trying to help. Furthermore, shortly after I began posting on internet blogs and forums about what AE911Truth had done to me, it was then that Mark Graham of AE911Truth contacted me, emailing me to offer me a refund because they noticed I was telling people what had happened to me.

If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive people by claiming to present the best "scientific forensic evidence", only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a cancer researcher only presented the evidence that supported his hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered his hypothesis, he would be ridiculed, criticized, and most likely fired from whatever institution he represented for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.

In my opinion, I find it to be highly probable that Richard Gage, Steven Jones, Alex Jones, and others, are ignoring a large amount of physical evidence and pushing the thermite-only story just in case we ever attempt to bring the true 9/11 perpetrators to justice. There is a thing called Double Jeopardy in our legal system, so we only get one shot at charging the true suspects, and thus, we better figure out exactly how they did it before we charge them. Thermite is easily disprovable in a court-of-law because it does not even come close to explaining all of the physical evidence from 9/11, so if AE911Truth is truly interested in the "Truth", perhaps they should stop pushing the unscientific thermite-only/explosives-only nonsense down everyone's throats. They should be encouraging us to think for ourselves, but instead, they are telling us what to think and what evidence to consider, while simultaneously ignoring an overwhelming sum of extremely important, easily verifiable, empirical evidence.

If you care about our beautiful planet, then please help bring the true 9/11 suspects to justice by familiarizing yourself with ALL of the important physical evidence that must be explained. Please consider the large sum of important physical evidence found at the following three websites:

1. "Where Did The Towers Go?" by Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D: http://wheredidthetowersgo.com

2. A very important, evidence-packed website: http://www.checktheevidence...

FREE E-book -- Finding The Truth

3. "9/11 & Free Energy" (my evidence-packed blog): http://pookzta.blogspot.com

Thank you for your time, consideration, and help.



Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M4 Medical Student
B.S. Biology/Neurobiology Show less
Read more

FLUORIDE: The Bizarre History Play

Please also be sure to visit my FLUORIDE ALERT Playlist

Information Links

Fluoride Action Network

Scientific Facts on the Biological Effects of Fluorides

Why EPA'S Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation

FLUORIDE ... The Aging Factor
How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride
John A. Yiamouyiannis, Ph.D. (1943-2000)

The Greatest "Scientific" Fluoride Fraud Yet?

50 Reasons to Avoid Fluoridation

Governmentally Approved Poison

Fluoride does not reduce cavities and does causes brittle bones and a soft brain

Fluoride: A Chronological History

Oregon Federal Judge Hands Darlene Sherrell a Major Victory Anti-Fluoridation Milestone

Michigan Mandatory Fluoridation Law Repealed

Frequently Asked Questions about Fluoride

Is Fluoride and Fluoridation Causing/Contributing To Cancer & Other Diseases

Dare to Think -- A Message About Fluoride, written by Darlene Sherrell

Fluoride Poisoning Symptoms

Fluoride Health Effects Database

Fluoride Alert Play

50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation




"In summary, we hold that fluoridation is an unreasonable risk." - US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HEADQUARTERS' UNION, 2001.

"Over the past ten years a large body of peer-reviewed science has raised concerns that fluoride may present unreasonable health risks, particularly among children, at levels routinely added to tap water in American cities." - ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP, July 2005

"I am quite convinced that water fluoridation, in a not-too-distant future, will be consigned to medical history." - Dr. ARVID CARLSSON, Winner, Nobel Prize for Medicine (2000).

to add this to Watch Later

Add to