Profile
Channel Views:
2,795
Total Upload Views:
131
Age:
42
Joined:
Jul 21, 2008
Latest Activity:
1 month ago
Subscribers:
3
With such a lack of evidence it is no wonder that there has not been a single prosecution leading to conviction anywhere in the world of the alleged 9/11 perpetrators, with the single exception of Zaccarias Moussaoui, who was only convicted because he was tortured until he admitted to involvement in the alleged plot.
The official account of the 9/11 attack is notable for its many contradictions. Explanations of the events of that day as told by media and government have been revised numerous times in the days and years since the attacks. Some of the more prominent examples of the shifting explanations include: * The existence of three mutually contradictory accounts of the military response to the attack. * The retraction by demolitions expert Van Romero of his emphatic observation that the WTC collapses were demolitions. * Multiple explanations for the collapses of the Twin Towers. * The change in the mission statement of the District of Columbia Air National Guard. * Changes in the story from military official regarding FAA requests for assistance and the reasons not a single jet fighter intercepted any of the commandeered airliners.
Normally, when suspects in a crime investigation repeatedly change their story, it is considered strong evidence of their guilt.
The execution of the September 11, 2001 attack required means possessed only by insiders in the U.S. government, and not by the alleged perpetrators, Osama bin Laden and his minions. An examination of who benefited from the attack also points to an inside job. While this notion is widely ridiculed, numerous historical precedents of false-flag operations give it credence.
In normal criminal investigations, prosecutors attempt to establish who had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out a crime, in order to identify suspects and direct investigations. The administration that immediately accused al Qaeda of committing the 9/11/01 crimes never established that its members had the means, motive, or opportunity to commit the crimes.
The official account of the 9/11 attack is notable for its many contradictions. Explanations of the events of that day as told by media and government have been revised numerous times in the days and years since the attacks. Some of the more prominent examples of the shifting explanations include: * The existence of three mutually contradictory accounts of the military response to the attack. * The retraction by demolitions expert Van Romero of his emphatic observation that the WTC collapses were demolitions. * Multiple explanations for the collapses of the Twin Towers. * The change in the mission statement of the District of Columbia Air National Guard. * Changes in the story from military official regarding FAA requests for assistance and the reasons not a single jet fighter intercepted any of the commandeered airliners.
Normally, when suspects in a crime investigation repeatedly change their story, it is considered strong evidence of their guilt.
The execution of the September 11, 2001 attack required means possessed only by insiders in the U.S. government, and not by the alleged perpetrators, Osama bin Laden and his minions. An examination of who benefited from the attack also points to an inside job. While this notion is widely ridiculed, numerous historical precedents of false-flag operations give it credence.
In normal criminal investigations, prosecutors attempt to establish who had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out a crime, in order to identify suspects and direct investigations. The administration that immediately accused al Qaeda of committing the 9/11/01 crimes never established that its members had the means, motive, or opportunity to commit the crimes.
Country:
United States
Recent Activity
|
DiabloUniverse favorited a video
Homerbear46 here...
On July 19, 2011 05:24 AM I uploaded the first " more |
|
|
|
DiabloUniverse liked a video
Homerbear46 here...
On July 19, 2011 05:24 AM I uploaded the first " more |
|
|
|
DiabloUniverse favorited a video
2010 NIST FOIA footage shows explosives going off during the destruction...
more
|
|
|
|
DiabloUniverse liked a video
2010 NIST FOIA footage shows explosives going off during the destruction...
more
|
|
|
|
DiabloUniverse commented on Ron Paul on "The Civil War"
"Let me ask you this......
ARE THERE ANY ALTERNATE DEFINITIONS FOR THE PHR..." more |
|
2.
Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive . a person of ANY RACE or origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, IGNORANT, etc.
dictionary*reference*com/brows
Good day.
good day
=^.^=
nOm
was
an
inside
job.
On October 6, 2001, a senior-level U.S. government official, told CNN that U.S. investigators had discovered Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh (Sheik Syed), using the alias "Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad" had sent about $100,000 from the United Arab Emirates to Mohamed Atta.
What many don't know is that on the morning of September 11, Lt. Gen. Mahmood was at a breakfast meeting at the Capitol with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, Senator Bob Graham (D) and Representative Porter Goss (R). The meeting was said to have lasted at least until the second plane hit the World Trade Center.