CrazyBomber22's channel

CrazyBomber22 commented 3 weeks ago

31:08 Add to

Richard Dawkins: An atheist's call to arms

http://www.ted.com Biologist Richard Dawkins launches into a full-on appeal for atheists to make public their beliefs and to aggressively fight the...

611,567 views

CrazyBomber22 said:

@jct09100 You seem to be a bit intelligent, so try to figure out this analogy:

How did life begin?

We don't know.

Therefore: Krishna, God of the Hindus, created the world and the universe.

Replace Krishna with Thor, Ra, Apollo, Mithra, or whichever god you feel like. Or is it juse *your* god who...

• CrazyBomber22 liked 3 weeks ago

+ One more: Likedshow less

CrazyBomber22 commented 8 months ago

6:53 Add to

Draw Mohammad Day 2... NEEDS YOU!

If you support the goals of this protest and want to take part, upload your picture to flickr.com, then add it to the playlist at

http://www.flick...

80,487 views

CrazyBomber22 said:

@Daisycutt3r

But still I am glad you try to set yourself apart from such behaviors. Maybe one day islam will be like most of Christianity today... almost (not quite, yet) harmless. And maybe one day we can all look at each other and say "what the hell? why do we even believe in this crap?".

What ...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 8 months ago

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @Daisycutt3r

  Again the myth of the tolerant mulsim.

  How is it that Usama Hasan, an Iman in London, was expelled from the mosk and received death threats for trying to make a point that the quran was compatible with the theory of evolution?

  How come when I go to Dubai I can't eat food on the stree...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 8 months ago

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @Daisycutt3r

  I don't know how perfect a society can be, but i *DO* know forcing children to marry at 9 years old, treating women like property, mutilating little girls, and who knows how many more atrocities is *NOT* the perfect society. In fact, it seems like hell to me.

  Ever heard the expressi...

• CrazyBomber22 liked 8 months ago

+ One more: Commented, Commented, Likedshow less

CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

9:58 Add to

Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

160,801 views

CrazyBomber22 said:

@no1hoopsman

Where else does the "scientific community" referr to Price's equations as the proof for the "original sin"?

And better yet, and this is *extremely* important, what the f*ck is the "original sin" concept price thinks he proved? And why is that so important to you, if you admit not kno...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  The "Original Sin" is a religious concept (can't find a formal concept anywhere else), and has *not* been proven in anyway by Price's argument. If you'd like, you can state a formal definition for the "original sin".

  Who makes the claim is one reporter turned scientist turned mental...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  Again, thank you for pointing me to that book. It seems to be a little obscure, but very much worth a reading.

  As you'll see if you read the whole of it, there is no proof supplied for religion in any way, and that is not even what it's about:

  "Evolutionary biology is a huge subject....

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  Read a bit more, and you'll find this gem:

  "I’m being, perhaps a tiny bit unfair, but I have to say that I think that this reading of the world is monstrous. It expresses a grotesque and infantile megalomania. When I first read Kieth Ward’s book on this matter, I came to the conclus...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  "The most sophisticated argument for religious belief in a Darwinian world is that it works. It persists. If the ultimate ambition of a universal Darwinism is to be a science that explains why some things exist and other do not, or do so no longer, then survival becomes an unanswera...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  Finally, the source! :)

  Thank you for pointing me to the book. I've been reading that RFH lecture, and it's lovely.

  Now I understand a bit more about that claim about the "original sin" (made by the reporter, by the way, not any scientist). It has, as predicted, no proof useful for ...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  "what do we mean by original sin ? This was his interpretation. His proof was of a mathematical equation that leads to this conclusion; it is credited to him by scientists;"

  Tell me *WHERE* his theory (a solid one) has *ANY* connections or implications to the religious "original sin" (or even an ...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  Wasn't he an "unstable" person? Who had (or thought he had) a "supernatural experience"?...

  As for the "faith in science", google "faith in science" and read the blog on discovery magazine, which explains why there is no "faith" in science. It's too big to discuss here, and seems li...

+ View allshow less

CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

9:58 Add to

Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

160,801 views

CrazyBomber22 said:

@no1hoopsman

Wow. I'm still shocked. What proof are you talking about? Which proves what? "God"? "Original sin" (a term, not the religious version of the "Original sin", as you admitted)? You mean it has been proven, and no one knows?...

• CrazyBomber22 commented 9 months ago

  9:58 Add to

  Richard Dawkins & Alister McGrath Debate part 1/7

  Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath's Debate at The Oxford Literary Festival

  160,801 views

  CrazyBomber22 said:

  @no1hoopsman

  From what I read about him, he had a "religious experience". He felt he had a supernatural experience (unstable, eh?). So doesn't seem like it had anything to do with his work. Unless you show me otherwise, of course.

  On the point of "faith"... you are confusing "faith in proof" with...

+ View allshow less