" Remember when I demanded ONE grammatically-parallel to Mark 16: 16 sentence in the entire English language that supported your twists? You remember that one: "He that (a) and (b) shall (c) receive $1,000, but he that does not (a) shall not (c) receive $1,000. That was months ago, and I aint seen it yet, dude." <-- I notice ya saw fit not to do it, as usual.

The baptism of Mark 16 is parallel to the baptism of Matt 28, and the baptism of Matt 28 was to be administered BY THE DISCIPLES, wasn't it? So it was water baptism after all - and your buddy Calvin said so, in case you were wondering. LOL @ "might have been Holy Spirit baptism."  Yeah, well, it wasn't, so you get busy with that grammatically-parallel sentence as I requested. Maybe your friends will help ya.

No, you IMPUDENT HERETIC, I have answered your questions: (1) the eunuch in Acts 8 was baptized in front of the military retinue which protected his money (vs. 27), therefore making it a public profession of faith; (2) here's GREEK SCHOLARSHIP: ''"Repent, and let each one of you be baptized at the name of Jesus Christ, for the forgiveness of your sins...." ...εἰς is subordinate to μετανοήσατε alone, rather than to βαπτισθήτω. ..... Such a view is an acceptable way of handling εἰς....'--Dr. Daniel B. Wallace; (3) Mark 16:16 is to be compared with both Mark 16:17 and Acts 1:5; Christ may have been referring to the baptism of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. Why, YOU LOSE; LOLOL!!!!!!

Well, have ya gone back to studying a little, so you won't be confused about "Apostle" Philip administering one of your "public private baptisms" to the eunuch out in the desert in front of that imaginary pagan entourage of "money protectors" (you know, the ones the Bible never mentions nor implies)? Or are ya trying to locate that nonexistent "Greek Rule" that you "enforce", but can never quite put your finger on? You know, the one that relates to relative pronouns that you try to "elasticize" into applying to personal pronouns? Remember when I demanded ONE grammatically-parallel to Mark 16: 16 sentence in the entire English language that supported your twists? You remember that one: "He that (a) and (b) shall (c) receive $1,000, but he that does not (a) shall not (c) receive $1,000. That was months ago, and I aint seen it yet, dude. And I won't: there's NOT one! Perhaps you're studying your way out of these heretical positions, and, if so, good lulck. Anna.

Listen up once again, "barrypatrickius": SHUT YOUR LYING FACE, you forked-tongued SERPENT. I have cited credible sources that have refuted your false accusations, and no amount of bravado on your part can help you now. Edward Gibbon was no friend to Christianity and even he said that Augustine was not a murderer, you LIAR. Augustine and Calvin were great men of God, and Dr. Bonnet was not an HISTORICAL PERVERT like YOU are. The Five Points of Calvinism are scriptural and correct, and anytime you want to debate it in a neutral forum you just BRING IT ON, you loudmouthed HERETIC.

Hallo Brian,
I thought it time to come and show my face on your channel again. Soon this bright orange look of yours is going to turn into a putrid GREY. Can you handle that, you think? (*_*)

Aaah, I see you gave mrbarrypatrikius a darned good spanking! Good for you. I see you need a bigger stick, as he is back vomiting out his crud again. It's funny how these pretenders to the throne of grace will accept the protection of this monstrous God when somebody is threatening them and their stupidity - Oh yes, I can PROVE IT, just watch my video "Accusing the Brethren, Are You?" and you will see what I mean. They will LOVE this baby killing God with all that is within them when He is protecting them, but he becomes a MONSTER when He is also spoken of as the saving God of Scripture. Perhaps that is why He "murdered" His own Son? Perhaps that is why HIS gospel is an offense to them...poor darlings!
My love to you in Christ, Brian.
Liz.

Even if calvin and augustine weren't the bloodthirsty satanic murders that they were (Dr. Jules Bonnet is another satanic liar and falsifier of history) it is their doctrine, their soteriology that is thoroughly Satanic.. The God of calvinism is an unBiblical, arbitrary, capricious, tyrannical, despotic, satanic MONSTROSITY

(4) Dr. Jules Bonnet, in "Letters of John Calvin", Vol. 4, pgs. 434-438, refutes the assertion that Calvin wrote the letter you have cited. (5) John Calvin's wife was an Anabaptist. So yes, what you have posted is the putrid, vile, disgusting PUKE- VOMIT of Satan; either get your facts straight or SHUT YOUR FACE.

(2) Calvin did NOT murder Servetus: 'Calvin could be cruel to opponents, and he did not hesitate to persecute them, but there is NOTHING [emphasis mine] to suggest that he actively sought to kill them. Heresy was a capital offense, but Calvin did not want Servetus to die.'--Dr. Bruce Gordon, Titus Street Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Yale Divinity School, "Calvin", pgs. 217, 220 (3) Augustine did NOT murder any Donatists: 'The youth of Augustin had been stained by the vices and errors which he so ingenuously confesses; but from the moment of his conversion to that of his death the manners of the bishop of Hippo were pure and austere, and the most conspicuous of his virtues was an ardent zeal against heretics of every denomination—the Manichaeans, the Donatists, and the Pelagians against whom he waged a perpetual controversy.'--Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire', ch. 33

Listen up, "barrypatrickius"; you lousy lying HISTORICALLY IGNORANT PUNK, it's time for you to receive a SPANKING. (1) Calvin was a saved man: 'We do not obtain salvation either because we are prepared to embrace every dictate of the Church as true, or leave to the Church the province of inquiring and determining; but when we recognize God as a propitious Father through the reconciliation made by Christ, and Christ as given to us for righteousness, sanctification, and life. By this knowledge...we obtain an entrance into the kingdom of heaven. For when the Apostle says, "With the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation," (Rom. 10:10); he intimates, that it is not enough to believe implicitly without understanding, or even inquiring. The thing requisite is an explicit recognition of the divine goodness, in which our righteousness consists.'--'Institutes of the Christian Religion', III, 2, 2

Merry Christmas Brian. Sorry I am so late, but here I am, cap in hand with the good wishes for you and for a great 2012. May God continue to bless you, my brother.

Hey Mr barrypatrickius, YOU are going to get a hiding from Brian Cook when he comes home to find you lurking on his page. You do know that, don't you? Here you are dropping your vomit all over his page and he does NOT like cleaning up vomit....especially a CRETIN's vomit.
VV
vv