Blackwwoolff's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Blackwwoolff
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Channel Views:
21,415
Total Upload Views:
3,227
Joined:
Aug 29, 2006
Latest Activity:
2 years ago
Subscribers:
20
About Me:
 
I want to talk about the different dynamics of shooting seeing as how stats have caused them to be unjustly narrowed to two dimensions.

BASIC TERMINOLOGY

Jumper - a shot of a distance of 7 or more feet can be classified as a jumper (distance wise). So to get a REAL gist of someone's jumper, you would have to take that into consideration.

Midrange Jumper - a shot between 7-17 feet

1. 3 POINTERS MADE

Don't forget to factor in the following...

1. Attempts averaged. If you average 5 or more attempts per
game, you've got a nice chance of making a lot of 3s. This stat can be kinda' overrated to tell the truth without this taken into account.

2. 3P% CAN BE DECEPTIVE

3P% can be very deceptice simply based on the fact that how may you attempt (in most cases) greatly alter the dynamics of 3P%. For example, regardless of shooting ability 9.5/10 a guy shooting 5 3s a game is going to have a higher 3P% than someone with the same ability averaging 1 attempt a game.

3. 3P% IN RELATION TO ATTEMPTS PER GAME

There are tons of examples, but here is one with a GREAT 3-point shooter...

Larry Bird in years averaging 1 or less attempts = 25%
Larry Bird in years averaging over 1 attempt = 40%

(keep in mind that Bird is also one of the best midrange shooters ever and had amazing shot selection)

Examples with guys not known for 3s... (FREE THROWS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS, JUST EXTRA INFO!)

JORDAN

age 24 = 0.6 attempts (13%) 84% from the line
age 25 = 1.2 attempts (27%) 85% from the line
age 26 = 3.0 attempts (37.6%) 84% from the line

If these 3P% represent the shooting purely, then this would be a MIRACULOUS increase for such a short timespan, even for a hard working person. Based on pure improvement, he should be up to 40+% the next year at this rate!

age 27 = 1.1 attempts (31%) 85% from the line

What happened?! Did he improve so much just to get worse?! Or do the attempts have SOMETHING to do with it???!!! (BTW, he explained that he didn't want to fall in love with the 3-point line in an interview around this time)

MAGIC JOHNSON

age 28 = .8 attempts (19%)
age 29 = 2.4 attempts (31%) 91% from the line, BTW
age 30 = 3.5 attempts (38%) 89% from the line, BTW

Questions...

1. Ask yourself, is the 3P% of someone in a year taking 1 or less attempt relevant?

2. Does it matter what your 3P% is in a year averaging .8 attempts????!!!!!

3. What if you made 50% of .8 attempts, would anyone say you were the GOAT 3-point shooter???!!! It works both ways.

4. PROBLEMS WITH 3-POINT SHOOTING IN GENERAL

1. Its a high risk shot, but only with the benefit of 1 point. Ideal 3-point % is 40% and that's the IDEAL. That only illustrates the risk envolved. Making most of your shots creates consistency, which is a very valuable tool.

2. They are addictive. The average player doesn't have the discipline to properly plan his 3-point attempts in the flow of the game because once you make one or two, you feel invincible.

3. You lower your potential free throw opportunities (which is somewhat ironic seeing as how the benefit is an extra point while you lower your opportunities for 2 points in TWO different ways!)

The most contact is around the goal and it thins out the farther you get from the goal. Guys that shoot from deep a lot lessen their free throw opportunities (creating a fear of fouling you being a weapon in and of itself of course). Shaq makes more points from free throws than Steve Nash. That's just an EXTREME example, of course. But
even a lot of 3-point oriented guys who are great free throw shooters, don't get to the line that much anyway because there's less contact the farther you are from the rim. You
are FAR more likely to draw contact from a midrange shot (in the heart of the defense).

4. Its highly glamourized whereas the midrange shot is undervalued.

PROBLEMS WITH NARROW ASSESSEMENTS OF SHOOTING

The truth is, there is a whole WORLD to shooting outside of 3-point shooting and free throw shooting. Lets name a few.

1. Catching and shooting
2. Versatility in the different spots you are comfortable shooting from (not necessarily how far away they may be).
3. Teardrops (runners)
4. Midrange shooting. There is no stat for it.
5. Are you automatic from a certain side?
6. What are your "sweet spots"?
7. Are you automatic from the baseline (for example)?
8. Turnaround shooting
9. Pull-up jumpers
10. Bank shots
11. Shot selection
12. How consistently do you make your midrange shots?
13. If you average 1 3-point attempt a game, what is your 3P% in games
taking 3-7 attempts?
14. How efficient is your jumper overall? (shots beyond 6 feet overall that is).
15. Other.....
Country:
United States
Channel Comments
FuShengAlex (1 month ago)
Blackie....what a snoozefest UFC on Fox2 was,lol. All wrestlers laying on top of each other and leaving it in the hands of judges which was why I couldn't get into the sport in the first place.

I posted what I thought about Jones, I don't know what to do against that guy, only upcoming guy is Gustafsson from Sweden in LHW. He may have to move up to face tougher competition. Diaz vs. Condit is going to be insane!!!
mikenotnumberone1 (1 month ago)
sports science is good. Entertaining..I find it more entertaining to video tape myself trying to run on a treadmill....
Blackwwoolff (1 month ago)
Hey man, good to see you too!

Thanks Fu, its always good to introduce someone to something. Unfortunately though, I'm not really great with names in the sport for whatever reason. I'm pretty okay name wise with the light heavyweight and heavyweight divisions because I find less of them as exciting as the lower divisions who I generally can just watch any random fight. For whatever reason that hasn't lended itself well to learning their names. What do you think about this Jon Jones kid though? Only formally trained in Greco Roman Wrestling and only 1 loss by DQ and 8 of 14 wins by KO. He even put my boy Machida to sleep, lol.
mikenotnumberone1 (1 month ago)
Black!! What sup? Missed talking to ya!
FuShengAlex (2 months ago)
Hey Blackie......I must admit I have to thank you, I've never met you in person but you're the one that stoked my interest in UFC/MMA.

There was a point I had zero interest in the sport and spoke against it. Now I try to watch every card. Whats your take on the Diaz brothers? Not saying they're the best, but nobody fights like those two, they're crazy,lol.. Happy New Years.
Magic32Rice80 (2 months ago)
love the bg..
Blackwwoolff (3 months ago)
It looks like they might have somehting after all. Either way, I need to brush up on my college ball anyway, hehehe.
costcordero2 (3 months ago)
well, no nba - but college ball should b fun, i'll b watching 2 see how good this kid andre drummond will b, he reminds me a lot of dwight howard wwoolffman ... oh yeah, i'm siding with the owners on this one ...
Gemini050788 (5 months ago)
Thanks black...but one question....what happened to mikenots channel?
Blackwwoolff (5 months ago)
ROFL, yeah, some crazy stuff over there. I hate this whole lockout business though.Good to see you Gem and hope all that works out. I know I asked mikenot and Fu already, but Cost are you into the outdoors type sports?
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more