-
2 weeks ago
Debunkers VS Conspiracy Theorists: Who Needs To Be Educated?
I hope I made my point clear enough.
dalek14mc • 313 views
Berkeley626
commented:
-
2 weeks ago
Berkeley626
liked
-
-
1 month ago
LESLIE ROBERTSON AND STEVEN JONES DEBATE PT2
LESLIE ROBERTSON DEBATES STEVEN JONES.
911TRUTHINATOR • 1,902 views
Berkeley626
commented:
Tthe moment Jones referred to a paper being "peer reviewed" I would ask: "Where was that paper peer reviewed?" And then when Jones says "The Journal of 9/11 Studies", I would say: "Sorry Dr. Jones. But that is certainly not a peer reviewed science journal. That's an website you created for the pu...
-
1 month ago
Uninvited - Sophie Da Mey - Studio Version TIAR
Alanis Morissette - Uninvited cover by Turn It Around Records artiste Sophie Da Mey Recorded 2008 at www.turnitaroundrecords.co.uk
lcdadvert • 4,320 views
Berkeley626
commented:
Nice job!
-
4 months ago
Demolition Vs. World Trade Center: Audio Comparison
A simple audio comparison of explosive demolitions and the WTC collapses. Truthers frequently claim that explosives pulverised all the concrete, sh...
TheInsaneBolt • 2,341 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@Skeptic121 They were supposed to keep on hand two million tons of debris? Why?
-
5 months ago
9/11 Smoking Guns: The Squibs
Showing how the WTC squibs are not the result of a pancake collapse. Clips from 9/11 Mysteries and Loose Change.
citizenfor911truth1 • 7,058 views
Berkeley626
commented:
Look at what they cite as a "squib" at the 56 second mark. That supposed explosion is stationary. Since when are explosions stationary?
-
5 months ago
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1
MIT Engineer Jeff King's logical look at the official story of the WTC collapse
muzicmaker2001 • 290,004 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@muzicmaker2001 OK, setting up 257 floors of the three buildings would have taken months if not years of prep, and no one has provided an explanation as to how that could have been done under the noses of over 50,000 daily workers without a single one noticing. And no, neither Marvin Bush nor the...
-
5 months ago
9 11 Truth MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
9 11 Truth MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
The source of most if not all our woes, revealed (from the present to the past): Connecting...
911investigator • 5,881 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@USStateSponTerrorism Our government routinely uses genocide? Really? Since when?
-
5 months ago
9/11 Revisited - MIT Engineer Jeff King Analysis - Part 2
September 11th Revisited v.2 is a follow up to perhaps the most riveting film ever made about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a ...
illuminator911 • 6,949 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@BlazingFerret Jeff King has no PhD.
-
5 months ago
9/11 Revisited - MIT Engineer Jeff King Analysis - Part 1
September 11th Revisited v.2 is a follow up to perhaps the most riveting film ever made about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a ...
illuminator911 • 6,980 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@dallas71 You mean aside from the fact that Loose Change is filled with well documented lies and distortions? You normally get your science from high school kids?
-
5 months ago
Jeff King MIT on 911 Part 1
Jeff King, MIT engineer, explains how the official story about 9-11-01, is bogus. This clip was taken from 911 revisited. It is short and full of v...
itchyandscratchy • 22,039 views
Berkeley626
commented:
To say one's an “MIT engineer” is to imply that one either teaches engineering at MIT or else otherwise worked for MIT as an engineer. Jeff King is not now nor has he ever been an MIT engineer, nor has he ever taught engineering or worked as an engineer for any university ever. He’s been a family...
-
5 months ago
MIT engineer and research scientist Jeff King: insight into what most likely happened that day
MIT engineer and research scientist Jeff King details how the official government story violates the laws of physics and chemistry. He goes on to e...
freetruth101 • 18,387 views
Berkeley626
commented:
To say one's an “MIT engineer” is to imply that one either teaches engineering at MIT or else otherwise worked for MIT as an engineer. Jeff King is not now nor has he ever been an MIT engineer (or research scientist), nor has he ever taught engineering or worked as an engineer for any university ...
-
5 months ago
9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
We have actively studied the questionable nature of the official version of what happened to our nation on September 11, 2001.Throughout the 1st ye...
DickMunch23 • 11,533 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@nikto2000 Oh, you mean the thousands of structural engineers who support the official explanation know nothing about science or physics? Amazing that the buildings they design aren't collapsing left and right then. Surely you don't live in a building designed by one of them. Must be nice sleepin...
-
5 months ago
WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein
Those who question the official epxlanation of the 9/11 2001 attacks cling to this one issue. The owner of the World Trade Centers (the three that ...
jpass2424 • 367,019 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@Adrza011 buddy, "pull it" NEVER was an industry term meaning demolishing a building with explosives. Griffin made that up and you're just repeating it without bothering to check it out yourself. Go ahead any to find any demo professional who claims that the expression EVER meant demolishing a bu...
-
5 months ago
9/11 Towers Controlled Demolition Detailed Explanation, Freefall Speed, Explosions
Experts and college professors explain "freefall speed" and give opinions and the controlled explosion of the North Tower, South Tower, and Buildin...
tonybiviano • 35,751 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@tpgphotog Dude, those speeds are not possible to sustain if you want your plane to stay intact. You think the kamikaze pilots wanted their planes to remain intact? Those speeds are possible in a power dive if you have no interest in survival, which is precisely what happened.
-
5 months ago
Larry Silverstein admits to having demolished wtc building 7
It takes over two weeks to set up a controlled demolition of a building. So by admitting that he ordered the demolition of building 7 on September ...
vinayakaya • 153,567 views
Berkeley626
commented:
The fire commander is on record as saying he ordered the pulling of fire fighting operations earlier in the afternoon. Why would he order them pulled if there were no operations to pull?
-
5 months ago
FDNY describe the bombs planted in the World Trade Center
Firefighters describe the pre-set charges which brought down the towers in a controlled demolition.
Television viewers watching the horrific events...
911REICHSTAG • 48,268 views
Berkeley626
commented:
Ah, so the only things that can go boom in a fire are controlled demolition explosives. That would be news to virtually every fire fighter. Search the terms "fire" and "explosion" on Youtube and see how stupid a suggestion that is. Hey, I have a 2 caret cubic zirconia that looks just like a diamo...
-
5 months ago
9/11 Building 7 - Martin Noakes
An original music video that explores a few of the myriad of unanswered questions surrounding the events of 9/11. Please rate, comment & forward to...
marndin • 50,184 views
Berkeley626
commented:
@NoMoreWarNoMore The official story is vastly more plausible than demo pros sneaking into 257 floors and spending months planting explosives without any of the 50,000+ workers noticing, and then waiting to demo one building housing over 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel while a fire burned for seven ...
-
5 months ago
4409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle!
Thank you to all who have spread this video and the message! We could not grow without YOU.
Remember,
YOU have the...
RP4409 • 13,478,598 views
Berkeley626
commented:
And funny how Silverstein refers to the fire department making the decision to "pull it." Gee, what's more likely? That the fire department sent a demo crew to demolish a building housing over 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel that was on fire and join in on a mass murder conspiracy that already kill...
And given that neither controlled demolition nor thermite ever produces pools of molten metal of any kind that stays molten for even hours, much less six weeks (as at Ground Zero), even if it were molten steel, it couldn't have been produced by either controlled demolition nor thermite.