AxeMan0170's channel

@TheStoicPoet Of course you would, I suppose you have a major in Scripture studies?

@93Cobalt I could give you a number of reasons to prove you wrong in regards to your comment regarding evolution, but I'll only point out (again) that mathematically there is not enough time in the universe for all the processes that cause life to have happened by chance. That's exactly why scien...

@flexpape I think not, do your own research, as I have, and try and keep an open mind. Also try and reseach who Wescott and Hort are, that may give you an Idea of where the problem lies. I am certainly not a scholar, and make no apologies for it, but I do sense that nether are you, and I do not h...

@RaveriusMax 1) Nope 2) Nope 3) also Noper. Your statements lack depth, if everything, as you point out, is subjective, or in other words relative, all you gain with that is to devalue your own statement, since that would also be relative or subjective. Who's to say you are right?

@Quartrez Consider it as you please, that's your prerogative.

@dareartes. "Archaeological evidence for Jesus doesn't exist"... Really? what do you call the gospels?? History is 'plagued' with the evidence of Jesus of Nazareth, and the big problem for deniers is that as much as they have tried to debunk HISTORY they have only made the case stronger for Chris...

@ItsNotEvenSunny See, exactly my point, a lot of assumptions with no basis whatsoever. So much for educated atheists.

@BeauG92 Funny how you say in your channel (that's if you are Jack) that you fully believe in God, yet you don't say what god that is.

It is quite clear that you have very little knowledge in regards to the God of the Bible and in regards to the Bible itself. Perhaps it would pay for you to do ...

The more I try to make sense of what Dr Ehrman says, the more I realize he is being myopic in studying the NT, If all 4 documents had been written by one person I would agree there would not be 'discrepancies', but even then, why can he not see that the discrepancies are or can be amplifications ...