good question.The problem with an answer is that it must be up to muslims to determine the course of islam and islamic people & politics.Radical stinkinislam is like a cancer.It only destroyes. It does no one any good.If it could be kept only among those who want to live with it & it's rules then, fine; Fuck them. However, like a cancer it spreads to uninfected areas.When that happens, like a cancer it must be stoped. Kill it, cut off the affected part, whatever but do not allow it to spread.

I have noticed you weren`t able to answer my last posts, and it`s better this way.
Anyway, I see that you have changed your profile completely.
Congratulations on that, Truth always prevails.
After all I don`t want to end the contact in an ignoble manner.
Wish you the best for finding the objective unbribed Truth.

Hag Sameah, Merry Christmas
Auser

p.s. when a person looks for a woman for life he should look for the alike and resembling himself and avoid preffering looks over personality. In mine and traditional opinions.
Sent to: RheinHauser5

How can you cite from the same sources as I do and call "my sources" - fake. Where it is stated that they are fake, anyway?
Doron M. Behar, MD, PhD is actually Doron Bachar [or Bakhar] (probably the more correct spelling) and he is an Israeli jew.
Can you be more specific about which research exactly "was rejected by mainstream science as fake research" and cite the proffesional `mainstream` sources for that?

" The type of research that you are quoting and analyzing was rejected by mainstream science as fake research"
Oh really? Where is it said so? in the head of mr. höhergestellt (you)? The researches I have cited are from the same pages you did, exept that you accept what they state when it suits you and overlook and ignore other facts so that you won`t have a complete whole picture.
I have cited Behar, just like you did. Is his work half fake? half for me and half for you? (haha)
Other researchers like Semino, Hammer, Nebel and Shen have found similar results and non of them has found more than 24% of shared paternal genes. The research by Behar was the largest of all (X5.5 times larger sample number than the 2nd largest).

As stated in the full comprehensive table of "Haplogroup distribution among Ashkenazim" there is not a single haplogroup which is shared by more than 19% of the population. So how can one claim 87.5% semitic genes while the highest number that unites Ashkenazi Jews in any descent (maternal or paternal) is only 40% (45% at most).
In paternal line (all ash-jews) it is 19% at most, as cited here numerously. You claim on your channel that J1 and J2 is present in all (?) ashkenazi jews, but that`s an illusion, it`s about 19% for each one of them, and I have cited that from Behar`s study which is the largest (others got 24% at most).

I cite here even higher numbers of that maternally unifying gene:
"It is hypothesized that the subclade represents one of four major founding maternal lineages ("founding mothers") of Ashkenazi Jews which together account for 45% of all Ashkenazi mtDNA haplotypes. Approximately 19% of Ashkenazi Jews with ancestry from Poland are in mtDNA haplogroup K1a1b1a. However, K1a1b1a has also been found in individuals of no known Jewish ancestry, and the explanation will require further research. The haplogroup is distributed in Europe and the Middle East. Estimates suggest approximately 1,600,000 Jews worldwide would be K1a1b1a." Why only 19% in Poland. Anyway it`s not 87.5%.
By the way it is found in non-jewish populations like in 13% in Bulgaria and Norway, 18% in a province in France, etc. But even if considered a jewish one, still only up to 40%-45% and even less in eastern european jews.

Another great issue is that all that data (so is the one I cited) is about ashkenazi jews and not specifically eastern european jews. I never said that western european jews are of Khazar descent, neither I said that all east.eu.jews are all Khazars. What I said was that the bulk of the population is from the Khazars, and actually I was wrong to say Khazars, I should have said non-israelite in origin. I`ve had a mistake there and I admit it, as a real man, in contrast to you. (still waiting for citation of me mentioning german laws of return. Do you admit you were wrong or still stuck there?). It might even be not correct to say "bulk", but to think they are pure semitic is ridiculous. I never denyed the precense of semitic genes in Ashkenazi Jews.

"about 40% of the current Ashkenazi population is descended matrilineally from just four women, or "founder lineages", "
Fist of all that`s just 40%, you said something about 87.5%, isn`t there a difference.
Second of all it`s only the maternal line, what about the paternal.
By the way: "The overwhelming majority of a human's DNA is contained in chromosomes in the nucleus of the cell, but mtDNA is an exception"
But I won`t be expanding the importance of that, there`s enought in the main concept to adress.
I suppose you would say something like: "in Judaism only the mother counts you retard anti-semitic liar, I`m gonna kick your ass" (haha, kid)
But, when you talk about genes - talk genes. Judaism never cared about genes anyway, and couldn`t.

Those 2 definitions refer to, that when a person "wants" a result, it is considered to be an intention and as a threat is defined as mentioned above, that expression is to be considered a threat both by word definition and by legal terms.
So in objective eyes you are the liar, in your eyes anything is possible (haha).
By the way, you are the one to continue threatening in every post od your`s. Look at how I ended my last post:
" Conclusion : Even that it is considered a "Cohanim gene" it is found only in 46% Cohanim and only 15%-19% of jews, it is found in other different nationalities and even in greater numbers. Yet another ancient gene. "
All my comments in that serie exept the first one (refering to the disputed threat) contain no referance at all to you, no threats, no calling names.
You however ended the last serie of comments with:
"Israel is MY NATIVE land, and give me your address and I WILL PERSONALLY KICK YOU OUT OF ISRAEL."
And talking about me again.

"I would like to fock your mother was never a threat"
In my view of things (and of real men in general), when a man says something he want, he will get it. As I said you are no man, you`re a kid, aged ~17 I suppose. You might learn a lesson the hard way, by talking like that. I wish someone like me will punish you for your way of talking if not here then in your country.
I have also cited the definition of `threat` from the dictionary as: "An expression of an intention to inflict pain, injury, evil, or punishment."
In the 1978 Law Commission of England and Wales the definition of `intention` was mentioned as:
"Therefore, according to the Committee a person intends a result when he:
(i)...wants the particular result to follow from his act, or" and:
"The definition of intention provides that someone "intends" a result when:
...he wants it to exist or occur, is aware that it exists or is almost certain that it exists or will exist or occur."