Profile
Name:
Stewart
Channel Views:
3,878
Style:
Variety
Age:
40
Joined:
June 07, 2007
Last Sign In:
13 hours ago
Subscribers:
131
Website:
Politics, Music, Art, and Humor.....
Bradley Infotainment combines
intelligent information with quality
entertainment: hence "Infotainment".
We hope you visit our main website
and enjoy all we have to offer!
Bradley Infotainment combines
intelligent information with quality
entertainment: hence "Infotainment".
We hope you visit our main website
and enjoy all we have to offer!
About Me:
9/11 researcher, spiritual explorer,
and all round funny guy.
Country:
United States
Recent Activity
There hasn't been any recent activity.
Subscriptions
(45)
Subscribers
(131)
Channel Comments
(33)












No, actually it's outright lie.
Marvin Bush DID work for Securecom until the summer of 2000 (one year before 9/11).
Securecom DID have a contract to upgrade WTC security in 1998 (three years before 9/11), but was NEVER in charge or WTC security.
The Port Authority has ALWAYS been in charge of WTC security.
So did you watch Nat Geo's "hit piece"?
I liked it when your messiah Richard Gage wouldn't even discuss how the New Wookie Order got the explosives into 3 of the biggest buildings in the world.
To add insult to injury, the Popular Mechanics "hit job" also aired Sunday night on the history channel!
ROFL!
First off, Popular Mechanics debunked your moronic theories.
Your only response was "yellow journalism"!
This Sat. at 5 PM.................it's Nat Geo's turn! They even debunk you nanothermite claim. I dare you to watch it................unless you're afraid!
What took Jones and Harrit over five years to fabricate was debunked in less than five months to debunk!
Steven Jones said "put up, or shut up". Well, it's time for Dr. Jones to shut up!
I believe in free speech no matter what. I didn't block you. Your last post is on my channel.
Unless this a just a another 9/11 twoofer strategy to avoid difficult questions.
DEAL WITH IT!
Empirical evidence? ROFL! You don't even know what that means. You don't even have a science based education!
"we saw a fire starting to show at windows in 7 World Trade Center, decided to go in and try and see if there was anybody in the building and/or put out the fires, and we did a search from floor to floor of 7 World Trade Center passing fire on floors 3, 7, 9. The standpipes had no water. We tried to extinguish a few fires with cans. When we got to 11, there was just too much smoke and we decided that, without water, if we went any higher, we'd be on fool's mission.
So we left 7 World Trade Center, back down to the street, where I ran into Chief Coloe from the 1st Division, Captain Varriale, Engine 24, and Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did."
I have a degree in civil engineering and over ten years of experience so don't think you can use magic physics to prove you points.
FROM NIST WEBSITE MORON
"From video evidence, significant portions of the cores of both buildings (roughly 60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) are known to have stood 15 to 25 seconds after collapse initiation before they, too, began to collapse. Neither the duration of the seismic records nor video evidence (due to obstruction of view caused by debris clouds) are reliable indicators of the total time it took for each building to collapse completely."