The Netherlands is one of the biggest contributors to developing nations in the world. Yet some political parties want to cut in development aid, others want to increase it. But I wonder: why are we only talking about money? Isn't there a better, more constructive way to help developing nations? For example by investing in creating a specific infrastructural improvements? In my opinion we should talk about development aid in a more concrete and specific way. Off course that costs money too, but there's more to the subject than just dollars or euros.

So my question to this years attendants of the Clinton Global Initiative is: How do you see the future of development aid? And: what's the best way to do this?

This year President Clinton asked people to tape a question for his Clinton Global Initiative summit. So I've decided to ask the attendants this question. If you have a question too; post a video response to President Clintons message.

Raymond Mens, the Netherlands (less info)