Thanks for the luv man!!

Did you?
And even if they saw metal, it dosen't mean they saw steel.
Aluminium melts at much lower temperature then steel.

You know what? Even if it was molten steel, how does that point to an inside job?

There were no residue of nanothermite in the rubble. No firemen said anything about molten pools of metal.

A plane that would get close to crashing accidentaly in a building is a landing, slow flying, low on fuel plane.
Not a full throttle overspeeded Jet with fuel for an international flight.

The steel wasn't certified to whitstand these temperatures, the fireproofing was supposed to do the job.
It was blown off during the impact on the impacted floors.

Building charts that will prove that black smoke even if it burns for >100 minutes, does mean that the fire is oxygen starved?

No one said the steel had melted. No one said the fires had to be 2700F.
Steel losses 50% of it's strength in 1100F, and the worst fires in the WTC were 1800.
Black smoke dosen't mean oxygen starved fire at all, this is simply a lie made by Sophia in 9/11 Mysteries.
If it's true, how come that the North Tower was burning for over 100 minutes, and all this time it had black smoke?
Jet fuel, and office material produce black smoke. There is no rule about smoke color=oxygen starved/not starved fires.

You made that claim, show me an evidence that it was.

It wasn't

im good how r u

thank u